Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25352891›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2014

Management of LBP at primary care level in South Africa: up to standards?

Mel E Major-Helsloot, Lynette C Crous, Karen Grimmer-Somers, Quinette A Louw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 'Sometimes I feel like the only physio in the whole wide world, so alone'.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring patients' lived experience on the barriers to accessing low back pain health services.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Scoping Review on the Epidemiology of Chronic Low Back Pain among Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. The prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of chronic low back pain in KwaZulu-Natal.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Physiotherapy services in patient care in Bhutan.Human resources for health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mel E Major-HelslootPhysiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa ; European School of Physiotherapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences/Hogeschool van Amsterdam, PO Box 2557, 1000 CN Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lynette C CrousPhysiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa.
Karen Grimmer-SomersPhysiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa ; International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, School of Health Sciences, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
Quinette A LouwPhysiotherapy division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa.
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary Health Care (PHC) is well suited for management of low back pain (LBP). Prevalence of (chronic) LBP is suspected to be high among visitors of the South African primary care centers, but currently no information exists on prevalence or guideline adherence.

objectivesTo establish if treatment received for LBP in public PHC in the Cape Town area compares with international evidence based guidelines.

methodsCluster randomization determined the 8 community health centres where the study took place. A measurement tool was developed and validated for this population. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analytical techniques were applied.

results489 participants (mean age: 44.8) were included in this study. Lifetime prevalence was 73.2% and 26.3% suffered from chronic low back pain (CLBP) . Pain medication was the only form of treatment received by 90% of the sample. Interventions received seemed to be unrelated to type of LBP (acute, sub acute and chronic). Referral to physiotherapy, education and advice to stay active were rarely done. Participants expressed low satisfaction with treatment.

conclusionsCurrent management of LBP at PHC level appears to be ineffective and not conform guidelines. Further South African research should focus on barriers as well as measures to be taken for implementation of LBP guidelines.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultCommunity Health CentersDisease ManagementFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSouth AfricaguidelinesLow back painmanagementprimary careSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID25352891
PMCPMC4209660
OpenAlexW1998686459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.