Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25352870›Full record

Trial reportAfrican health sciences2014

Impact of medication and psychological behaviour assessment by community pharmacists in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients after hospital stay.

Sudhir Singh Gangwar, N Monisha, Jainaf Nachiya, Kanchana Narasingarao, S Parimalakrishnan, Seo Pratap Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in African health sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacist services for non-hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhir Singh GangwarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
N MonishaDepartment of Pharmacy, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jainaf NachiyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kanchana NarasingaraoAndhra Yuvathi Mandali, School of Pharmacy, Barkatpura, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.
S ParimalakrishnanDepartment of Pharmacy, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
Seo Pratap SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Annamalai University · INGanesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug related problem (DRPs) is a key factor which will affect the outcome of therapy and safety.

objectiveTo assess the DRPs in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and psychological aspects of patients by community pharmacists to observe the rate of DRP.

methodsProspective randomized controlled intervention study involved T2DM patients and conducted in two community pharmacies at Kanpur from January 2012 to December 2012. The assessment of DRPs was based on the PCNE. Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1c), low density lipoproteins (LDL), blood pressure(BP), foot examinations, changes medical and medication utilization were studied. Using as control group, received usual care, and interventional group provided, intervened with use of the standard treatment guidelines (STG). Researcher provided the knowledge to community pharmacists and patients. Baseline and interventional data were collected at 0,3,6,9 and 12 months.

resultsOver the 12 month study, participants' average HBA1C reduced from 8.9% at initial visit to 7.5%. During this time, the eye examination rate was raised from 31% to 48%, and the foot examination rate was raised from 35% to 50%.

conclusionThe intervention of pharmacists showed little influence on any of the intermediate health outcomes in T2DM.

Indexed as

PharmacistsAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLength of StayLipoproteins, LDLMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePharmaciesProspective StudiesSelf CareGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsLipoproteins, LDLDrug related problemsMedication reviewPCNE classificationPsychological behaviorType 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Identifiers

PMID25352870
PMCPMC4209623
OpenAlexW2123722440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.