ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014
Oligotyping reveals differences between gut microbiomes of free-ranging sympatric Namibian carnivores (Acinonyx jubatus, Canis mesomelas) on a bacterial species-like level.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using meta-analysis to understand the impacts of dietary protein and fat content on the composition of fecal microbiota of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): A pilot study.MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Pooled it
- The Gut Microbiome Profile of Lions in Etosha National Park, Namibia.Research square · 2026Article
- Regional Lassa virus lineages select for divergent MHC-I repertoires in Mastomys natalensis rodents.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Multi-omic profiling reveals distinct gut microbial and metabolic landscapes in golden snub-nosed monkeys under contrasting conservation strategies.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Seasonal and Regional Dynamics of the Intestinal Microbiota inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Delayed feeding disrupts diurnal oscillations in the gut microbiome of a neotropical bat in captivity.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
- Nutritional and Microbiome Effects of a Partial Substitution of Poultry Meat with Hydrolyzed Feather Meal in Dog Diets.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Shotgun metagenomics analysis of gut microbiota of three indigenous fish species from the Kizil River, Xinjiang.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Group membership, not diet, structures the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome in a wild primate.mSphere · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota composition and diversity inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Immunogenetics, sylvatic plague and its vectors: insights from the pathogen reservoir Mastomys natalensis in Tanzania.Immunogenetics · 2023Article
- The fecal microbiomes analysis of Marabou storks (Leptoptilos crumenifer) reveals their acclimatization to the feeding environment in the Kampala urban areas, Uganda.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2023Article
- Human encroachment into wildlife gut microbiomes.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Fly-over phylogeny across invertebrate to vertebrate: The giant panda and insects share a highly similar gut microbiota.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- The Bacterial Microbiome in the Small Intestine of Hooded Seals (Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Host-associated microbiomes are predicted by immune system complexity and climate.Genome biology · 2020Article
- The Gene Catalog and Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiome of Big Cats Provide New Insights onFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Gut Microbiota Plasticity Influences the Adaptability of Wild and Domestic Animals in Co-inhabited Areas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The carnivorous digestive system and bamboo diet of giant pandas may shape their low gut bacterial diversity.Conservation physiology · 2020Article
- Are the gut microbial systems of giant pandas unstable?Heliyon · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent gut microbiome studies in model organisms emphasize the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the variation of the bacterial composition and its impact on the overall health status of the host. Species occurring in the same habitat might share a similar microbiome, especially if they overlap in ecological and behavioral traits. So far, the natural variation in microbiomes of free-ranging wildlife species has not been thoroughly investigated. The few existing studies exploring microbiomes through 16S rRNA gene reads clustered sequencing reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a similarity threshold (e.g., 97%). This approach, in combination with the low resolution of target databases, generally limits the level of taxonomic assignments to the genus level. However, distinguishing natural variation of microbiomes in healthy individuals from "abnormal" microbial compositions that affect host health requires knowledge of the "normal" microbial flora at a high taxonomic resolution. This gap can now be addressed using the recently published oligotyping approach, which can resolve closely related organisms into distinct oligotypes by utilizing subtle nucleotide variation. Here, we used Illumina MiSeq to sequence amplicons generated from the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene to investigate the gut microbiome of two free-ranging sympatric Namibian carnivore species, the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and the black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas). Bacterial phyla with proportions >0.2% were identical for both species and included Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. At a finer taxonomic resolution, black-backed jackals exhibited 69 bacterial taxa with proportions ≥0.1%, whereas cheetahs had only 42. Finally, oligotyping revealed that shared bacterial taxa consisted of distinct oligotype profiles. Thus, in contrast to 3% OTUs, oligotyping can detect fine-scale taxonomic differences between microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.