ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2014
The amblyopic eye in subjects with anisometropia show increased saccadic latency in the delayed saccade task.
Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Slow binocular reading during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) in children with amblyopia and the role of fixation instability.Vision research · 2025Article
- The impact of eye movements on amblyopic vision: A mini-review.Vision research · 2025Review
- Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Structural and functional alterations in the brains of patients with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia: a systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Amblyopia and the whole child.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023Review
- Children With Amblyopia Make More Saccadic Fixations When Doing the Visual Search Task.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Orienting of covert attention by neutral and emotional gaze cues appears to be unaffected by mild to moderate amblyopia.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Interocular Differences in Spatial Frequency Influence the Pulfrich Effect.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Enhanced Gray Matter Volume Compensates for Decreased Brain Activity in the Ocular Motor Area in Children with Anisometropic Amblyopia.Neural plasticity · 2020Article
- An Unexpected Spontaneous Motion-In-Depth Pulfrich Phenomenon in Amblyopia.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Attention deficits in Amblyopia.Current opinion in psychology · 2019Review
- Visuomotor Behaviour in Amblyopia: Deficits and Compensatory Adaptations.Neural plasticity · 2019Review
- Both saccadic and manual responses in the amblyopic eye of strabismics are irreducibly delayed.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- The Initiation of Smooth Pursuit is Delayed in Anisometropic Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016Article
- Saccadic latency in amblyopia.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Editorial: Neural bases of binocular vision and coordination and their implications in visual training programs.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2015Article
- Educating the blind brain: a panorama of neural bases of vision and of training programs in organic neurovisual deficits.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The term amblyopia is used to describe reduced visual function in one eye (or both eyes, though not so often) which cannot be fully improved by refractive correction and explained by the organic cause observed during regular eye examination. Amblyopia is associated with abnormal visual experience (e.g., anisometropia) during infancy or early childhood. Several studies have shown prolongation of saccadic latency time in amblyopic eye. In our opinion, study of saccadic latency in the context of central vision deficits assessment, should be based on central retina stimulation. For this reason, we proposed saccade delayed task. It requires inhibitory processing for maintaining fixation on the central target until it disappears-what constitutes the GO signal for saccade. The experiment consisted of 100 trials for each eye and was performed under two viewing conditions: monocular amblyopic/non-dominant eye and monocular dominant eye. We examined saccadic latency in 16 subjects (mean age 30 ± 11 years) with anisometropic amblyopia (two subjects had also microtropia) and in 17 control subjects (mean age 28 ± 8 years). Participants were instructed to look at central (fixation) target and when it disappears, to make the saccade toward the periphery (10°) as fast as possible, either left or the right target. The study results have proved the significant difference in saccadic latency between the amblyopic (mean 262 ± 48 ms) and dominant (mean 237 ± 45 ms) eye, in anisometropic group. In the control group, the saccadic latency for dominant (mean 226 ± 32 ms) and non-dominant (mean 230 ± 29 ms) eye was not significantly different. By the use of LATER (Linear Approach to the Threshold with Ergodic Rate) decision model we interpret our findings as a decrease in accumulation of visual information acquired by means of central retina in subjects with anisometropic amblyopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.