Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25352790›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2014

The amblyopic eye in subjects with anisometropia show increased saccadic latency in the delayed saccade task.

Maciej Perdziak, Dagmara Witkowska, Wojciech Gryncewicz, Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Jan Ober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Amblyopia and the whole child.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Delayed Correction for Extrapolation in Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Attention deficits in Amblyopia.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Initiation of Smooth Pursuit is Delayed in Anisometropic Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016
    Article
  16. Saccadic latency in amblyopia.Journal of vision · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maciej PerdziakLaboratory for Oculomotor Research, Department for Biophysical Measurements and Imaging, Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland.
Dagmara WitkowskaLaboratory for Oculomotor Research, Department for Biophysical Measurements and Imaging, Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech GryncewiczLaboratory for Oculomotor Research, Department for Biophysical Measurements and Imaging, Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Przekoracka-KrawczykLaboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznan Poznan, Poland.
Jan OberLaboratory for Oculomotor Research, Department for Biophysical Measurements and Imaging, Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term amblyopia is used to describe reduced visual function in one eye (or both eyes, though not so often) which cannot be fully improved by refractive correction and explained by the organic cause observed during regular eye examination. Amblyopia is associated with abnormal visual experience (e.g., anisometropia) during infancy or early childhood. Several studies have shown prolongation of saccadic latency time in amblyopic eye. In our opinion, study of saccadic latency in the context of central vision deficits assessment, should be based on central retina stimulation. For this reason, we proposed saccade delayed task. It requires inhibitory processing for maintaining fixation on the central target until it disappears-what constitutes the GO signal for saccade. The experiment consisted of 100 trials for each eye and was performed under two viewing conditions: monocular amblyopic/non-dominant eye and monocular dominant eye. We examined saccadic latency in 16 subjects (mean age 30 ± 11 years) with anisometropic amblyopia (two subjects had also microtropia) and in 17 control subjects (mean age 28 ± 8 years). Participants were instructed to look at central (fixation) target and when it disappears, to make the saccade toward the periphery (10°) as fast as possible, either left or the right target. The study results have proved the significant difference in saccadic latency between the amblyopic (mean 262 ± 48 ms) and dominant (mean 237 ± 45 ms) eye, in anisometropic group. In the control group, the saccadic latency for dominant (mean 226 ± 32 ms) and non-dominant (mean 230 ± 29 ms) eye was not significantly different. By the use of LATER (Linear Approach to the Threshold with Ergodic Rate) decision model we interpret our findings as a decrease in accumulation of visual information acquired by means of central retina in subjects with anisometropic amblyopia.

Indexed as

amblyopiaanisometropiaanisometropic amblyopiadelayed saccadesaccadic latencysaccadometry

Identifiers

PMID25352790
PMCPMC4196517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.