Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25352776›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2014

Non-viral gene therapy that targets motor neurons in vivo.

Mary-Louise Rogers, Kevin S Smith, Dusan Matusica, Matthew Fenech, Lee Hoffman, Robert A Rush, Nicolas H Voelcker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Machine intelligence for nerve conduit design and production.Journal of biological engineering · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-viral therapeutic approaches to ocular diseases: An overview and future directions.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary-Louise RogersDepartment of Human Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kevin S SmithDepartment of Human Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dusan MatusicaDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Matthew FenechDepartment of Human Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lee HoffmanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD, USA.
Robert A RushDepartment of Human Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nicolas H VoelckerAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Mawson Institute, University of South Australia Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in neurological gene therapy is safe delivery of transgenes to sufficient cell numbers from the circulation or periphery. This is particularly difficult for diseases involving spinal cord motor neurons such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We have examined the feasibility of non-viral gene delivery to spinal motor neurons from intraperitoneal injections of plasmids carried by "immunogene" nanoparticles targeted for axonal retrograde transport using antibodies. PEGylated polyethylenimine (PEI-PEG12) as DNA carrier was conjugated to an antibody (MLR2) to the neurotrophin receptor p75 (p75NTR). We used a plasmid (pVIVO2) designed for in vivo gene delivery that produces minimal immune responses, has improved nuclear entry into post mitotic cells and also expresses green fluorescent protein (GFP). MLR2-PEI-PEG12 carried pVIVO2 and was specific for mouse motor neurons in mixed cultures containing astrocytes. While only 8% of motor neurons expressed GFP 72 h post transfection in vitro, when the immunogene was given intraperitonealy to neonatal C57BL/6J mice, GFP specific motor neuron expression was observed in 25.4% of lumbar, 18.3% of thoracic and 17.0% of cervical motor neurons, 72 h post transfection. PEI-PEG12 carrying pVIVO2 by itself did not transfect motor neurons in vivo, demonstrating the need for specificity via the p75NTR antibody MLR2. This is the first time that specific transfection of spinal motor neurons has been achieved from peripheral delivery of plasmid DNA as part of a non-viral gene delivery agent. These results stress the specificity and feasibility of immunogene delivery targeted for p75NTR expressing motor neurons, but suggests that further improvements are required to increase the transfection efficiency of motor neurons in vivo.

Indexed as

immunogenesp75NTRPEGylationPEIretrograde transporttargeted gene delivery

Identifiers

PMID25352776
PMCPMC4196515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.