ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical named entity recognition based on domain knowledge and position encoding.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- TECRR: a benchmark dataset of radiological reports for BI-RADS classification with machine learning, deep learning, and large language model baselines.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- A scoping review of natural language processing of radiology reports in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning to Preoperatively Predict Lymph Node Metastasis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Electronic Medical Records: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Transfer language space with similar domain adaptation: a case study with hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2022Article
- Automatic Extraction of Lung Cancer Staging Information From Computed Tomography Reports: Deep Learning Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.Health information science and systems · 2020Article
- The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Automated Detection of Measurements and Their Descriptors in Radiology Reports Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Algorithm.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
- Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Review
- Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
- Automated Radiology Report Summarization Using an Open-Source Natural Language Processing Pipeline.Journal of digital imaging · 2018Article
- A Scalable Machine Learning Approach for Inferring Probabilistic US-LI-RADS Categorization.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2015
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiology reports are usually narrative, unstructured text, a format which hinders the ability to input report contents into decision support systems. In addition, reports often describe multiple lesions, and it is challenging to automatically extract information on each lesion and its relationships to characteristics, anatomic locations, and other information that describes it. The goal of our work is to develop natural language processing (NLP) methods to recognize each lesion in free-text mammography reports and to extract its corresponding relationships, producing a complete information frame for each lesion. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe built an NLP information extraction pipeline in the General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE) NLP toolkit. Sequential processing modules are executed, producing an output information frame required for a mammography decision support system. Each lesion described in the report is identified by linking it with its anatomic location in the breast. In order to evaluate our system, we selected 300 mammography reports from a hospital report database.
resultsThe gold standard contained 797 lesions, and our system detected 815 lesions (780 true positives, 35 false positives, and 17 false negatives). The precision of detecting all the imaging observations with their modifiers was 94.9, recall was 90.9, and the F measure was 92.8.
conclusionsOur NLP system extracts each imaging observation and its characteristics from mammography reports. Although our application focuses on the domain of mammography, we believe our approach can generalize to other domains and may narrow the gap between unstructured clinical report text and structured information extraction needed for data mining and decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.