ArticleJournal of medical genetics2014
International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Pooled it
- Navigating ethics in HIV data and biomaterial management within Black, African, and Caribbean communities in Canada.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- The generic Informed Consent Service gICSJournal of translational medicine · 2020Article
- [Ethical, legal and social issues publications on biobanks 2011-2018. A scoping review.]Revista espanola de salud publica · 2020Article
- How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving 'understanding' in informed consent.Trials · 2017Article
- Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several stakeholders in the field of biobank research are currently developing and evaluating innovative consent procedures, and in doing so refer to national and international guidelines that regulate biomedical research. The objectives of this study were to present (1) a synthesis of all consent issues mentioned or required in guidelines that are of potential relevance to biobank research and (2) a detailed overview of similarities and differences between these guidelines. This analysis considered a purposive sample of the nine most internationally recognised research guidelines plus a national checklist for developing consent forms. The synthesis of all included research guidelines found 41 issues of potential relevance to consent procedures in biobank research. The guidelines differ substantially with respect to (1) how comprehensively they address these consent issues, (2) their definition and explanation of the issues and (3) how directly or indirectly the issues are mentioned. The set of 41 consent issues presented in this paper should be further developed in a continuous process. Our findings on the differences among major research guidelines also raise the issue of a more systematic development and revision process for these guidelines. The presented set of content issues potentially relevant to consent in biobank research can inform the balanced development or evaluation of consent forms, as well as the development and revision of corresponding research guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25351952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.