Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25351721›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2015

Overlap of proteomics biomarkers between women with pre-eclampsia and PCOS: a systematic review and biomarker database integration.

Gulafshana Hafeez Khan, Nicolas Galazis, Nikolina Docheva, Robert Layfield, William Atiomo

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Human Ovary and Future of Fertility Assessment in the Post-Genome Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Review: Proteomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gulafshana Hafeez KhanDivision of Human Development, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, D Floor, East Block, Nottingham, UK gulafshanahafeez@hotmail.com.
Nicolas GalazisDivision of Human Development, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, D Floor, East Block, Nottingham, UK.
Nikolina DochevaDivision of Human Development, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, D Floor, East Block, Nottingham, UK.
Robert LayfieldSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
William AtiomoDivision of Human Development, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, D Floor, East Block, Nottingham, UK.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo any proteomic biomarkers previously identified for pre-eclampsia (PE) overlap with those identified in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). SUMMARY ANSWER: Five previously identified proteomic biomarkers were found to be common in women with PE and PCOS when compared with controls. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Various studies have indicated an association between PCOS and PE; however, the pathophysiological mechanisms supporting this association are not known. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and update of our PCOS proteomic biomarker database was performed, along with a parallel review of PE biomarkers. The study included papers from 1980 to December 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsIn all the studies analysed, there were a total of 1423 patients and controls. The number of proteomic biomarkers that were catalogued for PE was 192. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Five proteomic biomarkers were shown to be differentially expressed in women with PE and PCOS when compared with controls: transferrin, fibrinogen α, β and γ chain variants, kininogen-1, annexin 2 and peroxiredoxin 2. In PE, the biomarkers were identified in serum, plasma and placenta and in PCOS, the biomarkers were identified in serum, follicular fluid, and ovarian and omental biopsies. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The techniques employed to detect proteomics have limited ability in identifying proteins that are of low abundance, some of which may have a diagnostic potential. The sample sizes and number of biomarkers identified from these studies do not exclude the risk of false positives, a limitation of all biomarker studies. The biomarkers common to PE and PCOS were identified from proteomic analyses of different tissues. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis data amalgamation of the proteomic studies in PE and in PCOS, for the first time, discovered a panel of five biomarkers for PE which are common to women with PCOS, including transferrin, fibrinogen α, β and γ chain variants, kininogen-1, annexin 2 and peroxiredoxin 2. If validated, these biomarkers could provide a useful framework for the knowledge infrastructure in this area. To accomplish this goal, a well co-ordinated multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians, basic scientists and mathematicians is vital. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No financial support was obtained for this project. There are no conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

ProteomicsBiomarkersFemaleHumansPolycystic Ovary SyndromePre-EclampsiaPregnancyProteinsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersProteinsbiomarkeroverlappolycystic ovarian syndromepre-eclampsiaproteomic

Identifiers

PMID25351721
PMCPMC4262466
OpenAlexW2108689683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.