Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25351649›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2015

Secular trends in meat and seafood consumption patterns among Chinese adults, 1991-2011.

Z H Wang, F Y Zhai, H J Wang, J G Zhang, W W Du, C Su, J Zhang, H R Jiang, B Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z H WangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
F Y ZhaiChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
H J WangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
J G ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
W W DuChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
C SuChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
J ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
H R JiangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
B ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, Beijing, China.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
MONITORING SOCIAL CHANGE: HEALTH, REPRODUCTION, AGINGR01HD030880 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ADAIR, LINDA S, POPKIN, BARRY M · 1994 to 2024
$27.0M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
CHILD HEALTH EFFECTS OF RAPID SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGER01HD038700 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI POPKIN, BARRY M · 2000 to 2004
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD30880NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD38700NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSeveral studies have suggested differential health effects in relation to different meat composition in Western population. The purpose of the study was to examine secular trends in meat and seafood consumption patterns among Chinese adults between 1991 and 2011. SUBJECTS/

methodsOur longitudinal data are from 21,144 adults aged 18-75 in the China Health and Nutrition Survey, prospective cohort study. We assessed the intakes of meat and subtypes with three 24-h dietary recalls. We conducted multilevel mixed-effect logistic and linear regression models to examine meat consumption dynamics.

resultsThe proportions of Chinese adults who consumed red meat, poultry and seafood increased from 65.7% in 1991 to 86.1% in 2011, from 7.5 to 20.9% and from 27.4 to 37.8%, respectively. With rapid decrease in meat intakes since 2009, the intakes of total meat, red meat, poultry and seafood among their consumers were 86.7 g/day, 86.4 g/day, 71.0 g/day and 70.3 g/day in 2011, respectively, which were just slightly higher compared with those in 1991. Fatty fresh pork has been predominantly component of total meat overtime, which consituted 54.0% of total meat intake, 80.0% of fresh red meat intake and 98.7% of fatty fresh red meat intake in 2011.

conclusionOver the past two decades, meat consumption patterns of Chinese adults have been characterized by having a predominant intake of fatty fresh pork, suboptimal intakes of seafood and increased proportion of adults having excessive intakes of red meat and poultry overtime.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorMeatAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsChickensChinaFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25351649
OpenAlexW2021200444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.