Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25351455›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Natalie Causarano, Jennica Platt, Nancy N Baxter, Shaghayegh Bagher, Jennifer M Jones, Kelly A Metcalfe, Stefan O P Hofer, Anne C O'Neill, Terry Cheng, Elizabeth Starenkyj and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01857882 nacompletednot on this map

Breast Reconstruction Decision Workshop Pilot RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2012 to 2013Enrolled41ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDecision Support Workshop
NCT02734121 nacompletednot on this map

Pre-consultation Educational Group Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2015 to 2018Enrolled156ConditionsBreast CancerArmspre-consultation educational group intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalie CausaranoDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Reconstruction Program, University Health Network, 8N871, 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Jennica Platt
Nancy N Baxter
Shaghayegh Bagher
Jennifer M Jones
Kelly A Metcalfe
Stefan O P Hofer
Anne C O'Neill
Terry Cheng
Elizabeth Starenkyj
Toni Zhong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer survivors who make preference-sensitive decisions about postmastectomy breast reconstruction often have large gaps in knowledge and undergo procedures that are misaligned with their treatment goals. We evaluated the feasibility and effect of a pre-consultation educational group intervention on the decision-making process for breast reconstruction.

methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) where participants were randomly assigned to the intervention with routine education or routine education alone. The outcomes evaluated were decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, satisfaction with information, perceived involvement in care, and uptake of reconstruction following surgical consultation. Trial feasibility and acceptability were evaluated, and effect sizes were calculated to determine the primary outcome for the full-scale RCT.

resultsOf the 41 patients enrolled, recruitment rate was 72 %, treatment fidelity was 98 %, and retention rate was 95 %. The Cohen's d effect size in reduction of decisional conflict was moderate to high for the intervention group compared to routine education (0.69, 95 % CI = 0.02-1.42), while the effect sizes of increase in decision self-efficacy (0.05, 95 % CI = -0.60-0.71) and satisfaction with information (0.11, 95 % CI = -0.53-0.76) were small. A higher proportion of patients receiving routine education signed informed consent to undergo breast reconstruction (14/20 or 70 %) compared to the intervention group (8/21 or 38 %) P = 0.06.

conclusionsA pre-consultation educational group intervention improves patients' shared decision-making quality compared to routine preoperative patient education. A full-scale definitive RCT is warranted based on high feasibility outcomes, and the primary outcome for the main trial will be decisional conflict.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Support TechniquesPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformed ConsentMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPilot ProjectsReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.