ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015
A Community Coalition to Address Cancer Disparities: Transitions, Successes and Challenges.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adapting a Research and Community Capacity-Building Program to Address Rural Cancer Burden and Facilitate Partnership Development Between Rural Community Stakeholders and an Urban Comprehensive Cancer Center.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Construct validation of the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST).Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Strategies to Achieve Breast Health Equity in the St. Louis Region and Beyond over 15+ Years.Cancers · 2022Review
- Predictors of annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening among black men: results from an urban community-based prostate cancer screening program.Journal of men's health · 2021Article
- Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2020Article
- Content validation of a quantitative stakeholder engagement measure.Journal of community psychology · 2019Article
- Go Slow to Go Fast: Successful Engagement Strategies for Patient-Centered, Multi-Site Research, Involving Academic and Community-Based Organizations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Sickle cell disease and implementation science: A partnership to accelerate advances.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2017Review
- The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.Translational behavioral medicine · 2017Article
- Barriers and Strategies to Participation in Tissue Research Among African-American Men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017Article
- EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT.Journal of community psychology · 2017Article
- Toward the Elimination of Colorectal Cancer Disparities Among African Americans.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2016Article
- An Evaluation of Follow-Up Activities of Participants From an Urban Prostate Cancer Screening Event.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory (CBP) strategies are considered important to efforts to eliminate disparities. This paper outlines how the Program for the Elimination of Cancer Disparities (PECaD) uses CBP strategies as a part of a long-term cancer education, prevention, and control strategy in an urban community. Community partnerships have proved to be vital resources to inform PECaD's agenda and the research practice of academic partners. We begin with a description of PECaD governance and partnership structures. The paper then describes programmatic activities and successes, including efforts to monitor clinical trials, deployment of mammography resources, anti-smoking, and prostate and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening education. The influence of changes in funding priorities, preventive screening policy, and community partner development on the partnership process over time is discussed. PECaD community partners have grown and expanded beyond the Program's mission and developed additional partnerships, resulting in a reevaluation of relationships. The impact of these external and internal changes and pressures on the partnerships are noted. The evolution of the evaluation process and what it has revealed about needed improvements in PECaD activities and operations is presented. A summary of the lessons learned and their implications for CBP practice are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.