Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25350675›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 532014

Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research.

Lawrence A Palinkas

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03147924 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Effects of an Improvisation Group on Social Anxiety Among Help-seeking Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonRan2017 to 2017Enrolled5ConditionsAnxiety, Depression, Self Concept Alteration, Social SupportArmsImprovisation Group
NCT05587517 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled172ConditionsGrief, Trauma, Psychotherapy, Critical CareArmsEMPOWER, Supportive Conversation
NCT06576323 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Intervention Mapping Approach to Closing the Gap in Maternal OUD and Infant NAS Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsOpioid Use Disorder, Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeArmsAn implementation model for co-located Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) prescription in the NICU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trauma-informed juvenile justice systems: A systematic review of definitions and core components.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lawrence A Palinkasa School of Social Work , University of Southern California.

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH090322 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2011 to 2015
$8.1M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090322NIMH NIH HHS P30-MH090322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative and mixed methods play a prominent role in mental health services research. However, the standards for their use are not always evident, especially for those not trained in such methods. This article reviews the rationale and common approaches to using qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research based on a review of the articles included in this special series along with representative examples from the literature. Qualitative methods are used to provide a "thick description" or depth of understanding to complement breadth of understanding afforded by quantitative methods, elicit the perspective of those being studied, explore issues that have not been well studied, develop conceptual theories or test hypotheses, or evaluate the process of a phenomenon or intervention. Qualitative methods adhere to many of the same principles of scientific rigor as quantitative methods but often differ with respect to study design, data collection, and data analysis strategies. For instance, participants for qualitative studies are usually sampled purposefully rather than at random and the design usually reflects an iterative process alternating between data collection and analysis. The most common techniques for data collection are individual semistructured interviews, focus groups, document reviews, and participant observation. Strategies for analysis are usually inductive, based on principles of grounded theory or phenomenology. Qualitative methods are also used in combination with quantitative methods in mixed-method designs for convergence, complementarity, expansion, development, and sampling. Rigorously applied qualitative methods offer great potential in contributing to the scientific foundation of mental health services research.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchHealth Services ResearchHumansMental Health Services

Identifiers

PMID25350675
PMCPMC4212209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.