Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349706›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2014

The IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma-a surgical point of view.

Wentao Fang, Yangwei Xiang, Chenxi Zhong, Qunhui Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Relationship betweenKorean journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wentao Fang1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2 Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai 200030, China.
Yangwei Xiang1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2 Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai 200030, China.
Chenxi Zhong1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2 Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai 200030, China.
Qunhui Chen1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2 Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiaotong University Medical School, Shanghai 200030, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma has become the most common histologic type of lung cancers. Ground glass nodules (GGN), most of them early stage noninvasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA), have been encountered more frequently with the application of computed tomography (CT) screening. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) histologic lung adenocarcinoma classification combines radiologic, histologic, clinic, and molecular features to form a diagnostic approach for different subgroups of diseases. One of the major focuses of this new classification is the introduction of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and MIA, to replace the old term of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC). Not all GGNs are malignant lesions that should be surgically resected upon first presentation. A management approach different to solid nodules has been suggested based on the understanding that these lesions tend to have a more indolent nature. Hasty intervention should be avoided and potential surgical risks, radiation exposure, patient psychology, and socio-economical burden must be balanced comprehensively before surgery is decided upon. In the mean time, surgical issues concerning extent of resection and lymphadenectomy should also be carefully contemplated once intervention is deemed necessary. Extremely good prognosis with a near 100% disease-free survival could be expected when a pure GGN is completely resected. This has led to re-evaluation of sublobar resections, including both segmentectomy and big wedge resection, for small (≤2 cm) less invasive histology (AIS or MIA) appearing as GGN on CT scan. Evidences are accumulating that these limited resections are oncologically equivalent to standard lobectomy. And extensive lymph node dissection may not have additional staging or prognostic benefit. These would add new meaning to the contemporary definition of minimally invasive surgery for lung cancers. Overall, joint effort from a multiple disciplinary team is imperative, and decision making should be based on both anatomical and biological nature of the disease.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomahistologyLung cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID25349706
PMCPMC4209389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.