Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349702›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2014

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma: implications of the recent advances in molecular biology, treatment and the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification.

Swaroop Revannasiddaiah, Priyanka Thakur, Bhaskar Bhardwaj, Sridhar Papaiah Susheela, Irappa Madabhavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Computed tomography findings, clinicopathological features, genetic characteristics and prognosis ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The relationship between polymorphisms of genes regulating DNA repair or cell division and the toxicity of platinum and vinorelbine chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Swaroop Revannasiddaiah1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Cancer, Hospital & Research Institute, Government Medical College-Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India ; 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla, India, 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India ; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India ; 5 Department of Medical, Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Priyanka Thakur1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Cancer, Hospital & Research Institute, Government Medical College-Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India ; 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla, India, 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India ; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India ; 5 Department of Medical, Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Bhaskar Bhardwaj1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Cancer, Hospital & Research Institute, Government Medical College-Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India ; 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla, India, 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India ; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India ; 5 Department of Medical, Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sridhar Papaiah Susheela1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Cancer, Hospital & Research Institute, Government Medical College-Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India ; 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla, India, 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India ; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India ; 5 Department of Medical, Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Irappa Madabhavi1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Swami Rama Cancer, Hospital & Research Institute, Government Medical College-Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India ; 2 Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla, India, 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India ; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, HealthCare Global-Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India ; 5 Department of Medical, Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Government Medical College · INHealthcare Global Enterprises · INIndira Gandhi Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade ago, lung cancer could conveniently be classified into two broad categories-either the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), or the non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), mainly to assist in further treatment related decision making. However, the understanding regarding the eligibility of adenocarcinoma histology for treatments with agents such as pemetrexed and bevacizumab made it a necessity for NSCLC to be classified into more specific sub-groups. Then, the availability of molecular targeted therapy with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib and erlotinib not only further emphasized the need for accurate sub-classification of lung cancer, but also heralded the important role of molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinomas. Given the remarkable advances in molecular biology, oncology and radiology, a need for felt for a revised classification for lung adenocarcinoma, since the existing World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancer, published in the year 2004 was mainly a pathological system of classification. Thus, there was a combined effort by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) with an effort to inculcate newly established perspectives from clinical, molecular and radiological aspects in evolving a modern classification for lung adenocarcinomas. This review provides a summary of the recent advances in molecular biology and molecular targeted therapy with respect to lung adenocarcinoma. Also, a brief summation of the salient recommendations provided in the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinomas is provided. Lastly, a discussion regarding the future prospects with lung adenocarcinoma is included.

Indexed as

bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC)crizotinibEGFREML4-ALKerlotinibgefitinibIASLC/ATS/ERS classificationLung adenocarcinomapulmonary adenocarcinomatyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)

Identifiers

PMID25349702
PMCPMC4209383
OpenAlexW144604441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.