Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349618›Full record

ArticleCase reports in medicine2014

Desmoid-type fibromatosis of the mesentery: report of a sporadic case with emphasis on differential diagnostic problems.

Giovanni Li Destri, Maria Jessica Ferraro, Martina Calabrini, Monica Pennisi, Gaetano Magro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Annotating the Role ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni Li DestriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico-OVE, Via Santa Sofia 86, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6976-8171
Maria Jessica FerraroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico-OVE, Via Santa Sofia 86, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-4089
Martina CalabriniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico-OVE, Via Santa Sofia 86, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0498-402X
Monica PennisiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Radiology (DO.GI.RA.), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 86, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Gaetano Magro"Ingrassia" Department, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 86, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-6827
University of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm with local aggressiveness. The incidence of desmoid-type fibromatosis is 2-5/million/year with intra-abdominal fibromatosis, such as that which is reported in this clinical case, occurring only in 12-18% of cases. After having analyzed the pathogenetic hypotheses of desmoid-type fibromatosis, the authors point out that the diagnosis of this disease, especially in the intra-abdominal form, is often late, specifically when highly demolitive interventions are needed or when the limits of radical surgery have been exceeded. In the clinical case reported, the tumor was infiltrating both ileus and sigma. The authors consider the differential diagnosis of desmoid-type fibromatosis, especially with GISTs, with regard to both the radiological preoperative diagnostic and histological studies on the surgical specimen. Radical surgical excision is not always, for this disease, a sign of healing; in fact, even when the resection margins are negative, the incidence of recurrence is between 13 and 68%. The average time of recurrence is between 15 and 24 months; in this case report, the patient, who has not been subjected to complementary therapies, is tumor-free for over 30 months since surgery; his prognosis may be satisfactory if we consider the negativity of resection margins, which in any case remains the most important prognostic factor.

Identifiers

PMID25349618
PMCPMC4198783
OpenAlexW2070137808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.