Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349564›Full record

ArticleIntestinal research2014

Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability between Same-day Picosulfate and Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial.

Mi Seon Kang, Tae Oh Kim, Eun Hee Seo, Da Kyung Jung, Mo Se Kim, Nae Yun Heo, Jong Ha Park, Seung Ha Park, Young Soo Moon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intestinal research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mi Seon KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Tae Oh KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Eun Hee SeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Da Kyung JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Mo Se KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Nae Yun HeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jong Ha ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Seung Ha ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Young Soo MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KRInje University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIn the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability between same-day bowel preparation protocols using 2 sachets of Picosulfate and a 4 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.

methodsThe study had a single-center, prospective, randomized, and investigator-blinded, non-inferiority design. We evaluated bowel preparation quality according to the Ottawa scale, patient tolerability, compliance, incidence of adverse events, sleep quality, and polyp/adenoma detection rate.

resultsAmong the 196 patients analyzed (mean age, 55.3 years; 50.3% men), 97 received the same-day regimen of 2 sachets of picosulfate (group A) and 99 received the 4 L split-dose PEG regimen (group B). The Ottawa score of the total colon was 4.05±1.56 in group A and 3.80±1.55 in group B (P=0.255). The proportion of patients having adequate bowel preparation in the same-day picosulfate group (61.5%) was slightly less than the 4 L PEG group (71.3%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.133). Tolerability of the group A regimen was superior to that of the group B regimen (P<0.000). The same-day picosulfate regimen was associated with fewer adverse events, such as abdominal bloating (P=0.037) and better sleep quality (P<0.000).

conclusionsThe same-day picosulfate regimen and the 4 L split-dose PEG regimen had similar efficacy in bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy. However, the same-day picosulfate regimen was easier to administer, produced fewer adverse events, and enabled better sleep quality.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyPolyethylene glycolSodium picosulfate

Identifiers

PMID25349564
PMCPMC4204690
OpenAlexW2052723837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.