ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2014
Information prescriptions, 1930-2013: an international history and comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of physician prescribed information to the inflammatory bowel disease patients on quality of life and disease relapse: a randomised control trial.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Trial
- Impact of health information prescription in thyroid cancer.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Users' evaluation of Japan's cancer information services: process, outcomes, satisfaction and independence.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Personalization of health information prescription in diabetes clinical setting: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Involvement of information professionals in patient- and family-centered care initiatives: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018Article
- Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2017Article
- The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
- Consumer Use of "Dr Google": A Survey on Health Information-Seeking Behaviors and Navigational Needs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- The Efficacy of Written Information Intervention in Reduction of Hospital Re-admission Cost in Patients With Heart Failure; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRecently, government agencies in several countries have promoted information prescription programs to increase patients' understanding of their conditions. The practice has a long history and many publications, but no comprehensive literature reviews such as this.
methodsUsing a variety of high-precision and high-recall strategies, the researcher searched two dozen online bibliographic databases, citation databases, and repositories, as well as many print sources, to identify and retrieve documents for review. Of these documents, ninety relevant English-language case reports, research reports, and reviews published from 1930-2013 met the study criteria.
resultsEarly to mid-twentieth century reports covered long-standing practices and used no rigorous research methods. The literature since the mid-1990s reports on short-term trial projects, especially of government-sponsored programs in the United States and United Kingdom. Although the concept of information prescription has been in the literature and practiced for decades, no long-term research studies were found.
conclusionsMost of the literature is anecdotal concerning small pilot projects. The reports investigate physician, patient, and librarian satisfaction but not changes in patient knowledge or behavior. Many twenty-first century projects emphasize materials and projects from specific government agencies and commercial enterprises. IMPLICATIONS: While the practice is commonly believed to be a good idea and there are many publications on the subject, few studies provide any evidence of the efficacy of information prescriptions for increased patient knowledge. Well-designed and executed large or long-term studies might produce needed evidence for professional practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.