Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349501›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2014

Morphological and karyotypic differences within and among populations of Radopholussimilis.

Chun-Ling Xu, Yun Li, Hui Xie, Xin Huang, Wen-Jia Wu, Lu Yu, Dong-Wei Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chun-Ling XuLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yun LiLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Hui XieLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xin HuangLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Wen-Jia WuLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Lu YuLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Dong-Wei WangLaboratory of Plant Nematology /Research Center of Nematodes of Plant Quarantine/Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Street, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty populations of Radopholussimilis from three countries and different hosts (19 populations from ornamental plants and one population from ginger) were compared using morphological characters, morphometrics and karyotype between progeny from both single females and 30 females of each population. Morphological diversity existed in and among the populations, even within the progeny nematodes from single nematodes compared to that of 30 females. The labial disc shape, the number of head annuli, the terminated position of lateral lips, the number of genital papillae before cloacal apertures and female and male tail terminal shape showed variation. In addition, genital papillae arranged in a double row before cloacal apertures was first found in two ornamental populations. The karyotype of all the 20 populations was n = 5. Combining our results and previous studies, we support that Radopholuscitrophilus is a synonym of Radopholussimilis, and that it is not possible to distinguish physiological races or pathotypes of Radopholussimilis according to morphological characters or karyotype.

Indexed as

Burrowing nematodekaryotypemorphological comparisonoptical and SEM microscopy

Identifiers

PMID25349501
PMCPMC4205733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.