Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349413›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Benchmarking all-atom simulations using hydrogen exchange.

John J Skinner, Wookyung Yu, Elizabeth K Gichana, Michael C Baxa, James R Hinshaw, Karl F Freed, Tobin R Sosnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protein folding - seeing is deceiving.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Commonly used FRET fluorophores promote collapse of an otherwise disordered protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dielectric screening effect of electronic polarization and intramolecular hydrogen bonding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John J SkinnerDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and.
Wookyung YuDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Center for Proteome Biophysics, Department of New Biology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 711-873, Korea.
Elizabeth K GichanaDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and.
Michael C BaxaDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and.
James R HinshawChemistry.
Karl F FreedChemistry, James Franck Institute, Computation Institute, and freed@uchicago.edu trsosnic@uchicago.edu.
Tobin R SosnickDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and Computation Institute, and freed@uchicago.edu trsosnic@uchicago.edu.

Funding

X-RAY STUDIES OF NEUROFIBRILLARY TANGLES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BRAIN TISSUEP41RR008630 · NCRR · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2001 to 2011
$14.4M
Time resolved SAXS studies on the RP2/Arl3 complex pp.484-485P41GM103622 · NIGMS · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2012 to 2020
$11.9M
Kinetic studies of protein foldingR01GM055694 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOSNICK, TOBIN R · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PREPR25GM066522 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CARRILLO, ROBERT ARNULFO, RANDALL, GLENN C · 2004 to 2024
$6.7M
NCRR NIH HHS 2P41RR008630-18NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008630NIGMS NIH HHS 9 P41GM103622-18NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055694NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM066522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-time molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are now able to fold small proteins reversibly to their native structures [Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2011) Science 334(6055):517-520]. These results indicate that modern force fields can reproduce the energy surface near the native structure. To test how well the force fields recapitulate the other regions of the energy surface, MD trajectories for a variant of protein G are compared with data from site-resolved hydrogen exchange (HX) and other biophysical measurements. Because HX monitors the breaking of individual H-bonds, this experimental technique identifies the stability and H-bond content of excited states, thus enabling quantitative comparison with the simulations. Contrary to experimental findings of a cooperative, all-or-none unfolding process, the simulated denatured state ensemble, on average, is highly collapsed with some transient or persistent native 2° structure. The MD trajectories of this protein G variant and other small proteins exhibit excessive intramolecular H-bonding even for the most expanded conformations, suggesting that the force fields require improvements in describing H-bonding and backbone hydration. Moreover, these comparisons provide a general protocol for validating the ability of simulations to accurately capture rare structural fluctuations.

Indexed as

Deuterium Exchange MeasurementProtein UnfoldingGTP-Binding ProteinsHydrogenHydrogen BondingProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsHydrogenRecombinant Proteinsdenatured statesHXmolecular dynamicsprotein foldingunfolded state

Identifiers

PMID25349413
PMCPMC4234613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.