Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349080›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014

The change from brand-name to generic aromatase inhibitors and hormone therapy adherence for early-stage breast cancer.

Dawn L Hershman, Jennifer Tsui, Jay Meyer, Sherry Glied, Grace Clarke Hillyer, Jason D Wright, Alfred I Neugut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Financial Toxicity Monitoring in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient-Reported Outcomes During Cancer Treatment (Alliance AFT-39).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawn L HershmanDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM). dlh23@columbia.edu.
Jennifer TsuiDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).
Jay MeyerDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).
Sherry GliedDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).
Grace Clarke HillyerDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).
Jason D WrightDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).
Alfred I NeugutDepartment of Medicine, Gynecology and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons (DLH, JW, AIN) and Department of Epidemiology (DLH, JT, GCH, JW, AIN), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY (SG); Optum, Eden Prairie, MN (JM).

Funding

Training Program in Cancer-Related Population SciencesR25CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 2002 to 2016
$5.9M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonadherence to hormonal therapy is common and is associated with increased copayment amount. We investigated the change in adherence after the introduction of generic aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in 2010.

methodsUsing deidentified pharmacy and claims data from OptumInsight, we identified women older than 50 years on brand-name AIs (BAIs) and/or generic AIs (GAIs) for early breast cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. Clinical, demographic, and financial variables were evaluated. Adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) 80% or greater.

resultsWe identified 5511 women, 2815 (51.1%) on BAI, 1411 (25.6%) on GAI, and 1285 (23.3%) who switched from BAI to GAI. The median 30-day copayment was higher for BAI ($33.3) than for GAI ($9.04). In a multivariable Cox-proportional hazard analysis, women who took GAI were less likely to discontinue therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 0.84) compared with BAI. Discontinuation was positively associated with a higher monthly copayment of $15 to $30 (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.44) and more than $30 (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.80) compared with less than $15. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, adherence (medication possession ratio ≥ 80%) was positively associated with GAI use (odds ratio = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.91) compared with BAI and inversely associated with increased monthly copayment. In addition, adherence was associated with a high annual income of more than $100k/year (odds ratio = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.11).

conclusionsHigher prescription copayment amount was associated with nonadherence and discontinuation of AIs. After controlling for copayment, discontinuation was higher and adherence was lower with Brand AIs. Because nonadherence is associated with worse survival, efforts should be directed towards reducing out-of-pocket costs for these life-saving medications.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsDeductibles and CoinsuranceDrug CostsDrugs, GenericFemaleHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID25349080
PMCPMC4271034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.