Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349064›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2015

An insight into short- and long-term mechanical circulatory support systems.

Markus Ferrari, Peter Kruzliak, Kyriakos Spiliopoulos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biventricular impella (BiPella) utilization in fulminant COVID-19 myopericarditis-mediated cardiogenic shock during pregnancy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  3. [Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Effects of an intra-ventricular assist device on the stroke volume of failing ventricle: Analysis of a mock circulatory system.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2018
    Article
  7. Cardiogenic shock due to septic coronary embolism: treatment options for a rare entity.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  8. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with mild elevations of cardiac troponin.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  9. Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Review
  10. Outcome predictors in cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  11. [Importance of mechanical assist devices in acute circulatory arrest].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2016
    Review
  12. Status on Heart Transplantation in China.Chinese medical journal · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The utility of biomarker risk prediction score in patients with chronic heart failure.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus FerrariClinic of Internal Medicine 1, HSK, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden und der HELIOS Kliniken Gruppe, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Peter Kruzliak
Kyriakos Spiliopoulos
Masaryk University · CZUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction, postcardiotomy syndrome following cardiac surgery, or manifestation of heart failure remains a clinical challenge with high mortality rates, despite ongoing advances in surgical techniques, widespread use of primary percutaneous interventions, and medical treatment. Clinicians have, therefore, turned to mechanical means of circulatory support. At present, a broad range of devices are available, which may be extracorporeal, implantable, or percutaneous; temporary or long term. Although counter pulsation provided by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and comprehensive mechanical support for both the systemic and the pulmonary circulation through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain a major tool of acute care in patients with cardiogenic shock, both before and after surgical or percutaneous intervention, the development of devices such as the Impella or the Tandemheart allows less invasive forms of temporary support. On the other hand, concerning mid-, or long-term support, left ventricular assist devices have evolved from a last resort life-saving therapy to a well-established viable alternative for thousands of heart failure patients caused by the shortage of donor organs available for transplantation. The optimal selection of the assist device is based on the initial consideration according to hemodynamic situation, comorbidities, intended time of use and therapeutic options. The present article offers an update on currently available mechanical circulatory support systems (MCSS) for short and long-term use as well as an insight into future perspectives.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesEquipment DesignEvidence-Based MedicineExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart Bypass, LeftHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingShock, CardiogenicTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID25349064
OpenAlexW1963721236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.