Observational studyClinical drug investigation2014
Differential antiviral effects of pegylated interferon-α2a and pegylated interferon-α2b in chronic hepatitis C.
Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-α2a and -α2b show different pharmacokinetic properties but are used interchangeably for hepatitis C treatment in traditional dual combinations and with newer agents. We assessed whether peg-IFN antiviral effects vary with peg-IFN subtype, affecting viral response in a differential manner.
methodsChronic hepatitis C patients treated with ribavirin combined with peg-IFN-α2a (N = 109) or -α2b (N = 114) were studied. Hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation was performed by Cobas TaqMan 5 min before treatment start and subsequently after 48/72 h and 7, 14, 28 and 90 days. Antiviral effect was assessed in terms of viraemia changes over treatment. Histology grading and staging, interleukin-28B (IL28B) status and baseline viral genotype, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase and glucose were analysed.
resultsViraemia decline after 48/72 h and 7 days was significantly greater with peg-IFN-α2b (1.96 and 2.12 vs 1.49 and 1.20 log10 IU/mL with peg-IFN-α2a; p < 0.001). Differences were of larger extent in patients with advanced fibrosis (p = 0.002), genotype 1 infection (p = 0.002) and CT/TT genotypes of IL28B (p = 0.001). A rebound in viral load was observed significantly more often after the first dose in patients treated with peg-IFN-α2b (78 vs 28 % in those with peg-IFN-α2a; p = 0.0001). Differences between peg-IFNs disappeared by day 28 of treatment.
conclusionThere are significant pharmacodynamic differences between peg-IFN-α2a and -α2b in the early phase of chronic hepatitis C treatment. The greater early viral decline observed with peg-IFN-α2b was essentially confined to 'difficult to treat' patients. Whether this could affect response-guided treatment decision making, as well as triple drug regimens, needs to be assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25349040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.