ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014
Childhood cancer survivor care: development of the Passport for Care.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators associated with long-term follow-up care for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-based recommendations for the organization of long-term follow-up care for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the PanCareSurFup Guidelines Working Group.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Guideline
- Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes in Asian survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Pooled it
- A portable survivorship care plan: a tool that helps educate and improve knowledge in childhood cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Satisfaction with follow-up consultations among Swiss childhood cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Supporting Survivor-Centered Care Through Digital Health Integration.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- The Survivorship Passport for childhood cancer survivors: improvements and experience within several European PanCare projects.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Chronic Health Conditions and Academic Achievement: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Report.JCO oncology practice · 2026Observational
- Article
- Survivorship care and mortality in a contemporary and diverse cohort of childhood cancer survivors.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Addressing survivorship care gaps through digital innovation: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations in the e-QuoL project.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Expert consensus on disease-based long-term follow-up care plans for childhood cancer survivors.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Review
- Pediatric Cancer Survivorship: A Review.Pediatric annals · 2025Review
- Mapping of current resources and models of care for paediatric cancer survivors in Asia: a multinational survey.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers: A Review.JAMA oncology · 2025Review
- Preferences for survivorship education and delivery among Latino and non-Latino childhood cancer survivors and caregivers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Barriers to Care for Childhood Cancer Survivors at Risk for Late Cardiovascular Disease: A Mixed Methods Approach.Cancer survivorship research & care · 2025Article
- Article
- Late Adverse Effects after Treatment for Childhood Acute Leukemia.Acta medica academica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of long-term adverse effects and late effects of the disease and/or its treatment. In response to national recommendations to improve evidence-based follow-up care, a web-based support system for clinical decision making, the Passport for Care (PFC), was developed for use at the point of care to produce screening recommendations individualized to the survivor. To date, the PFC has been implemented in over half of the nearly 200 clinics affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group across the USA. Most clinician users report that the PFC has been integrated into clinic workflows, and that it fosters improved conversations with survivors about the potential late effects a survivor might experience and about the screening and/or behavioural interventions recommended to improve health status. Furthermore, clinicians using the PFC have indicated that they adhered more closely to follow-up care guidelines. Perspectives on the challenges encountered and lessons learned during the development and deployment of the PFC are reviewed and contrasted with other nationwide approaches to the provision of guidance on survivor follow-up care; furthermore, the implications for the care of childhood cancer survivors are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.