Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25348625›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2014

Epitope specificity delimits the functional capabilities of vaccine-induced CD8 T cell populations.

Brenna J Hill, Patricia A Darrah, Zachary Ende, David R Ambrozak, Kylie M Quinn, Sam Darko, Emma Gostick, Linda Wooldridge, Hugo A van den Berg, Vanessa Venturi and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. T Cell Receptor Profiling in Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Brenna J HillVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Patricia A DarrahVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Zachary EndeVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
David R AmbrozakVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Kylie M QuinnVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Sam DarkoVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Emma GostickInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom;
Linda WooldridgeFaculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom;
Hugo A van den BergMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom;
Vanessa VenturiComputational Biology Group, Centre for Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, New South Wales, Australia;
Martin LarsenINSERM, U1135, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, F-75013 Paris, France; and Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Université Paris 06), CR7, F-75013 Paris, France.
Miles P DavenportComputational Biology Group, Centre for Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, New South Wales, Australia;
Robert A SederVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
David A PriceVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Institute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom; ddouek@mail.nih.gov priced6@cardiff.ac.uk.
Daniel C DouekVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; ddouek@mail.nih.gov priced6@cardiff.ac.uk.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUNSW Sydney · AUCardiff University · GBCentre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses · FRInstitute of Infection and Immunity · CAUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

T Cell Immune Responses To HIV And Other PathogensZIAAI005033 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DOUEK, DANIEL CESAR · 2009 to 2025
$11.4M
Intramural NIH HHSWellcome Trust 100326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress toward understanding the correlates of protective T cell immunity in HIV infection, the optimal approach to Ag delivery by vaccination remains uncertain. We characterized two immunodominant CD8 T cell populations generated in response to immunization of BALB/c mice with a replication-deficient adenovirus serotype 5 vector expressing the HIV-derived Gag and Pol proteins at equivalent levels. The Gag-AI9/H-2K(d) epitope elicited high-avidity CD8 T cell populations with architecturally diverse clonotypic repertoires that displayed potent lytic activity in vivo. In contrast, the Pol-LI9/H-2D(d) epitope elicited motif-constrained CD8 T cell repertoires that displayed lower levels of physical avidity and lytic activity despite equivalent measures of overall clonality. Although low-dose vaccination enhanced the functional profiles of both epitope-specific CD8 T cell populations, greater polyfunctionality was apparent within the Pol-LI9/H-2D(d) specificity. Higher proportions of central memory-like cells were present after low-dose vaccination and at later time points. However, there were no noteworthy phenotypic differences between epitope-specific CD8 T cell populations across vaccine doses or time points. Collectively, these data indicate that the functional and phenotypic properties of vaccine-induced CD8 T cell populations are sensitive to dose manipulation, yet constrained by epitope specificity in a clonotype-dependent manner.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAdenoviridaeAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemalegag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGenetic VectorsH-2 AntigensHistocompatibility Antigen H-2DHumansImmunodominant EpitopesImmunologic MemoryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAIDS Vaccinesgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusH-2 AntigensH-2K(K) antigenHistocompatibility Antigen H-2DImmunodominant Epitopespol Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Identifiers

PMID25348625
PMCPMC4238745
OpenAlexW2140631420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.