ReviewThe pharmacogenomics journal2015
Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.
Review in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review.BMC pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Incidentalome from Genomic Sequencing: A Barrier to Personalized Medicine?EBioMedicine · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome/exome sequencing used in clinical trials (CTs) to identify 'druggable' mutations and targets uncovers incidental findings unrelated to the trial objectives but of value for participants, although ethically challenging. To be disclosed to trial participants, the analytical validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, clinical relevance and actionability of incidental genomic findings (IGFs) must be established. Special considerations should be taken with minors to disclose only those findings related to early-onset conditions or diseases and in cases where early implementation of measures is necessary to prevent the occurrence of diseases. A plan for disclosing incidental findings that classifies the types that can be found, and who, when and how these findings will be disclosed to participants, should be included in the trial protocol to be approved by the relevant institutional review board. IGFs in CTs raise new ethical challenges that must be discussed by CT stakeholders, professional associations and patient advocates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25348616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.