ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2014
[Procedure selection and technique of metabolic surgery].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Metabolic surgery or conservative measures as therapy of obese type 2 diabetics?]Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017Review
- [Management of complications after bariatric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
- [Metabolic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic surgery is becoming an impressive therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus and other metabolic diseases. Compared to conservative therapy bariatric procedures, such as gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric banding and biliopancreatic diversion, seem to achieve significantly higher remission rates and improvements in blood glucose metabolism. Recent studies describe additional effect mechanisms which go beyond the assumed mechanisms of restriction and malabsorption. The results in the current literature suggest that gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy provide the best metabolic risk-benefit profiles. Gastric banding and biliopancreatic diversion can only be recommended in specific cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.