Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25348402›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification.

T B K Reddy, Alex D Thomas, Dimitri Stamatis, Jon Bertsch, Michelle Isbandi, Jakob Jansson, Jyothi Mallajosyula, Ioanna Pagani, Elizabeth A Lobos, Nikos C Kyrpides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Genome of the Acid Soil-Adapted StrainFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

T B K ReddyProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA tbreddy@lbl.gov.
Alex D ThomasProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Dimitri StamatisProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Jon BertschProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Michelle IsbandiProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Jakob JanssonProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Jyothi MallajosyulaProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Ioanna PaganiProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Elizabeth A LobosProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Nikos C KyrpidesProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD; http://www.genomesonline.org) is a comprehensive online resource to catalog and monitor genetic studies worldwide. GOLD provides up-to-date status on complete and ongoing sequencing projects along with a broad array of curated metadata. Here we report version 5 (v.5) of the database. The newly designed database schema and web user interface supports several new features including the implementation of a four level (meta)genome project classification system and a simplified intuitive web interface to access reports and launch search tools. The database currently hosts information for about 19,200 studies, 56,000 Biosamples, 56,000 sequencing projects and 39,400 analysis projects. More than just a catalog of worldwide genome projects, GOLD is a manually curated, quality-controlled metadata warehouse. The problems encountered in integrating disparate and varying quality data into GOLD are briefly highlighted. GOLD fully supports and follows the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) Minimum Information standards.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidGenomicsMetagenomicsInternet

Identifiers

PMID25348402
PMCPMC4384021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.