Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25348238›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Robotic surgery for benign duodenal tumors.

Stephanie Downs-Canner, Wald J Van der Vliet, Stijn J J Thoolen, Brian A Boone, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, David L Bartlett, Mark P Callery, Tara S Kent, Herbert J Zeh and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Robotic transduodenal excision of ampullary tumour.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2017
    Article
  14. Diagnosis and Treatment of Duodenal Lipoma: A Systematic Review and a Case Report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Review
  15. [Surgical approach of gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie Downs-CannerDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Wald J Van der Vliet
Stijn J J Thoolen
Brian A Boone
Amer H Zureikat
Melissa E Hogg
David L Bartlett
Mark P Callery
Tara S Kent
Herbert J Zeh
A James Moser
University of Pittsburgh · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Training in Biotherapy of CancerT32CA113263 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Udai S Kammula · 2006 to 2026
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113263NCI NIH HHS T32CA113263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBenign duodenal and periampullary tumors are uncommon lesions requiring careful attention to their complex anatomic relationships with the major and minor papillae as well as the gastric outlet during surgical intervention. While endoscopy is less morbid than open resection, many lesions are not amenable to endoscopic removal. Robotic surgery offers technical advantages above traditional laparoscopy, and we demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this approach for a variety of duodenal lesions.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of all robotic duodenal resections between April 2010 and December 2013 from two institutions. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and operative details were recorded with special attention to the post-operative course.

resultsTwenty-six patients underwent robotic duodenal resection for a variety of diagnoses. The majority (88 %) were symptomatic at presentation. Nine patients underwent transduodenal ampullectomy, seven patients underwent duodenal resection, six patients underwent transduodenal resection of a mass, and four patients underwent segmental duodenal resection. Median operative time was 4 h with a median estimated blood loss of 50 cm(3) and no conversions to an open operation. The rate of major Clavien-Dindo grades 3-4 complications was 15 % at post-operative days 30 and 90 without mortality. Final pathology demonstrated a median tumor size of 2.9 cm with a final histologic diagnoses of adenoma (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 6), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (n = 2), lipoma (n = 2), Brunner's gland hamartoma (n = 1), leiomyoma (n = 1), and gangliocytic paraganglioma (n = 1).

conclusionRobotic duodenal resection is safe and feasible for benign and premalignant duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHamartomaHumansLaparoscopyLeiomyomaLipomaMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25348238
PMCPMC4529990
OpenAlexW2052324525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.