Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25347835›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2014

Mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in vineyards using reservoir pheromone dispensers.

Arturo Cocco, Andrea Lentini, Giuseppe Serra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mating Disruption ofInsects · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification ofInsects · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Managing the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, through pheromone-mediated mating disruption.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arturo CoccoDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy acocco@uniss.it.
Andrea LentiniDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Giuseppe SerraIstituto per lo Studio degli Ecosistemi, UOS di Sassari, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Traversa La Crucca 3, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
University of Sassari · ITInstitute of Ecosystem Study · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating disruption field experiments to control the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), were carried out in 2008 and 2009 in two commercial vineyards in Sardinia (Italy). The effectiveness of mating disruption was evaluated by testing reservoir dispensers loaded with 100 mg (62.5 g/ha) and 150 mg (93.8 g/ha) of the sex pheromone in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The number of males captured in pheromone traps, the P. ficus population density and age structure, the parasitism rate, the percentage of ovipositing females, and the crop damage were compared between disrupted and untreated plots. In both field trials, the number of males captured in mating disruption plots was significantly reduced by 86% and 95%, respectively. Mating disruption at the initial dose of 62.5 g/ha of active ingredient gave inconclusive results, whereas the dose of 93.8 g/ha significantly lowered the mealybug density and modified the age structure, which showed a lower percentage of ovipositing females and a higher proportion of preovipositing females. Mating disruption did not affect negatively the parasitism rate, which was higher in the disrupted than in the control plots (>1.5-fold). Crop damage at harvest was very low in both field trials and did not differ between treatments. Mating disruption was effective in wide plots protected with dispensers loaded with 150 mg of the sex pheromone, showing its potential to be included in the overall integrated control programs in Mediterranean wine-growing regions.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHemipteraInsect ControlItalyMaleMonoterpenesPopulation DensityReproductionSex AttractantsVitislavandulyl senecioateMonoterpenesSex Attractantsage population structurepest controlpopulation densitysex pheromonesexual communication

Identifiers

PMID25347835
PMCPMC5443473
OpenAlexW2140579972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.