Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25347739›Full record

ReviewOncogene2015

Hsp70 in cancer: back to the future.

M Y Sherman, V L Gabai

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Y ShermanDepartment of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
V L GabaiDepartment of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

HSP72 AND REGULATION OF STRESS KINASES IN TUMOR CELLSR01CA081244 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SHERMAN, MICHAEL Y · 2000 to 2013
$5.0M
Complex Role of HSF1 in Breast CancerR01CA176326 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CALDERWOOD, STUART KEITH, SHERMAN, MICHAEL Y · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081244NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic studies from cell culture and animal models have revealed critical roles for the heat shock protein Hsp70 in cancer initiation and progression. Surprisingly, many effects of Hsp70 on cancer have not been related to its chaperone activity, but rather to its role(s) in regulating cell signaling. A major factor that directs Hsp70 signaling activity appears to be the co-chaperone Bag3. Here, we review these recent breakthroughs, and how these discoveries drive drug development efforts.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsProtein BindingAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBAG3 protein, humanHSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25347739
PMCPMC4411196
OpenAlexW2010305557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.