Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25347725›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

The effect of S-adenosylmethionine on cognitive performance in mice: an animal model meta-analysis.

Sarah E Montgomery, Amir A Sepehry, John D Wangsgaard, Jeremy E Koenig

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DNMT3a Downregulation Ttriggered Upregulation of GABAAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conserved reduction of mProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Regulation of metabolic health by essential dietary amino acids.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2019
    Review
  12. Possible Involvement of Hydrosulfide in BMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E MontgomeryDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Amir A SepehryCollege for Interdisciplinary Studies, Graduate program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, Canada; UBC Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John D WangsgaardDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jeremy E KoenigFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Mount Saint Vincent University · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequently diagnosed form of dementia resulting in cognitive impairment. Many AD mouse studies, using the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), report improved cognitive ability, but conflicting results between and within studies currently exist. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of SAM on cognitive ability as measured by Y maze performance. As supporting evidence, we include further discussion of improvements in cognitive ability, by SAM, as measured by the Morris water maze (MWM).

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review up to April 2014 based on searches querying MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and Proquest Theses and Dissertation databases. We identified three studies containing a total of 12 experiments that met our inclusion criteria and one study for qualitative review. The data from these studies were used to evaluate the effect of SAM on cognitive performance according to two scenarios: 1. SAM supplemented folate deficient (SFD) diet compared to a folate deficient (FD) diet and 2. SFD diet compared to a nutrient complete (NC) diet. Hedge's g was used to calculate effect sizes and mixed effects model meta-regression was used to evaluate moderating factors.

resultsOur findings showed that the SFD diet was associated with improvements in cognitive performance. SFD diet mice also had superior cognitive performance compared to mice on an NC diet. Further to this, meta-regression analyses indicated a significant positive effect of study quality score and treatment duration on the effect size estimate for both the FD vs SFD analysis and the SFD vs NC analysis.

conclusionThe findings of this meta-analysis demonstrate efficacy of SAM in acting as a cognitive performance-enhancing agent. As a corollary, SAM may be useful in improving spatial memory in patients suffering from many dementia forms including AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCognitionDietDietary SupplementsFolic Acid DeficiencyMiceModels, AnimalNootropic AgentsS-AdenosylmethionineNootropic AgentsS-Adenosylmethionine

Identifiers

PMID25347725
PMCPMC4210123
OpenAlexW2057489281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.