ArticlePloS one2014
Protective effect of different anti-rabies virus VHH constructs against rabies disease in mice.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Camelid VHHs as a Versatile Platform for Combating Viral Infections.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Further characterization of infection mechanisms and transmission dynamics of rustrela virus in rodentThe Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- Analytical Performance of Nanobody-Based Immunoassay and Immunosensing Platforms for Bacteria and Toxin Detection: A Systematic Review.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Andrographolide Inhibits Rabies Virus Replication.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- Research Progress on the Application of Neutralizing Nanobodies in the Prevention and Treatment of Viral Infections.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Nanobodies as antivirals against rabies in experimentally infected mice.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2025Article
- Development of a sandwich ELISA for the specific quantitation of hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged proteins during their inducible expression in Escherichia coli.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Fully synthetic platform to rapidly generate tetravalent bispecific nanobody-based immunoglobulins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Generation of nanobodies acting as silent and positive allosteric modulators of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Therapeutic applications of nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections: Current update.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2023Review
- Research progress on neutralizing epitopes and antibodies for the Rabies virus.Infectious medicine · 2022Review
- Effective targeting of microglial P2X7 following intracerebroventricular delivery of nanobodies and nanobody-encoding AAVs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Applications of nanobodies in brain diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Article
- Transportation of Single-Domain Antibodies through the Blood-Brain Barrier.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Nanobodies mapped to cross-reactive and divergent epitopes on A(H7N9) influenza hemagglutinin using yeast display.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Brain Delivery of Single-Domain Antibodies: A Focus on VHH and VNAR.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Nanoparticle encapsulation increases the brain penetrance and duration of action of intranasal oxytocin.Hormones and behavior · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies virus causes lethal brain infection in about 61000 people per year. Each year, tens of thousands of people receive anti-rabies prophylaxis with plasma-derived immunoglobulins and vaccine soon after exposure. Anti-rabies immunoglobulins are however expensive and have limited availability. VHH are the smallest antigen-binding functional fragments of camelid heavy chain antibodies, also called Nanobodies. The therapeutic potential of anti-rabies VHH was examined in a mouse model using intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of rabies virus. Anti-rabies VHH were administered directly into the brain or systemically, by intraperitoneal injection, 24 hours after virus challenge. Anti-rabies VHH were able to significantly prolong survival or even completely rescue mice from disease. The therapeutic effect depended on the dose, affinity and brain and plasma half-life of the VHH construct. Increasing the affinity by combining two VHH with a glycine-serine linker into bivalent or biparatopic constructs, increased the neutralizing potency to the picomolar range. Upon direct intracerebral administration, a dose as low as 33 µg of the biparatopic Rab-E8/H7 was still able to establish an anti-rabies effect. The effect of systemic treatment was significantly improved by increasing the half-life of Rab-E8/H7 through linkage with a third VHH targeted against albumin. Intraperitoneal treatment with 1.5 mg (2505 IU, 1 ml) of anti-albumin Rab-E8/H7 prolonged the median survival time from 9 to 15 days and completely rescued 43% of mice. For comparison, intraperitoneal treatment with the highest available dose of human anti-rabies immunoglobulins (65 mg, 111 IU, 1 ml) only prolonged survival by 2 days, without rescue. Overall, the therapeutic benefit seemed well correlated with the time of brain exposure and the plasma half-life of the used VHH construct. These results, together with the ease-of-production and superior thermal stability, render anti-rabies VHH into valuable candidates for development of alternative post exposure treatment drugs against rabies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.