Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25347197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A comparison of three electrophysiological methods for the assessment of disease status in a mild spinal muscular atrophy mouse model.

Jia Li, Tom R Geisbush, William D Arnold, Glenn D Rosen, Phillip G Zaworski, Seward B Rutkove

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of Biomarkers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Structural and functional properties of bone are compromised in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Baseline results of the NeuroNEXT spinal muscular atrophy infant biomarker study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jia LiDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Tom R GeisbushDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
William D ArnoldDepartment of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Glenn D RosenDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Phillip G ZaworskiPharmOptima, LLC, Portage, Michigan, United States of America.
Seward B RutkoveDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMichigan United · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Rehabilitation Medicine Scientist Training (RMST) ProgramK12HD001097 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONINGER, MICHAEL L. · 1995 to 2016
$14.1M
Electrical Impedance Myography in an Animal ModelR01NS055099 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2007 to 2022
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001097NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055099NINDS NIH HHS R01NS055099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is a need for better, noninvasive quantitative biomarkers for assessing the rate of progression and possible response to therapy in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). In this study, we compared three electrophysiological measures: compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, motor unit number estimate (MUNE), and electrical impedance myography (EIM) 50 kHz phase values in a mild mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy, the Smn1c/c mouse.

methodsSmn1c/c mice (N = 11) and wild type (WT) animals (-/-, N = 13) were measured on average triweekly until approximately 1 year of age. Measurements included CMAP, EIM, and MUNE of the gastrocnemius muscle as well as weight and front paw grip strength. At the time of sacrifice at one year, additional analyses were performed on the animals including serum survival motor neuron (SMN) protein levels and muscle fiber size.

resultsBoth EIM 50 kHz phase and CMAP showed strong differences between WT and SMA animals (repeated measures 2-way ANOVA, P<0.0001 for both) whereas MUNE did not. Both body weight and EIM showed differences in the trajectory over time (p<0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). At the time of sacrifice at one year, EIM values correlated to motor neuron counts in the spinal cord and SMN levels across both groups of animals (r = 0.41, p = 0.047 and r = 0.57, p  = 0.003, respectively), while CMAP did not. Motor neuron number in Smn1c/c mice was not significantly reduced compared to WT animals.

conclusionsEIM appears sensitive to muscle status in this mild animal model of SMA. The lack of a reduction in MUNE or motor neuron number but reduced EIM and CMAP values support that much of the pathology in these animals is distal to the cell body, likely at the neuromuscular junction or the muscle itself.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsElectromyographyMiceMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Atrophy, Spinal

Identifiers

PMID25347197
PMCPMC4210182
OpenAlexW2037556712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.