Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25347154›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2015

Methods for detecting circulating cancer stem cells (CCSCs) as a novel approach for diagnosis of colon cancer relapse/metastasis.

Carla Kantara, Malaney Ravae O'Connell, Gurinder Luthra, Aakash Gajjar, Shubhashish Sarkar, Robert Leo Ullrich, Pomila Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Isolating Circulating Cancer Stem Cells (CCSCs) from Human Whole Blood.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla KantaraDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Malaney Ravae O'ConnellDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Gurinder LuthraDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Aakash GajjarDepartment of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Shubhashish SarkarDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Robert Leo UllrichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Pomila SinghDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Role of Annexin-II in growth factor/co-carcinogenic effects of progastrinR01CA097959 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SINGH, POMILA · 2003 to 2015
$3.7M
Growth Factors, Curcumin and Colon CarcinogenesisR01CA114264 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI SINGH, POMILA · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA114264NCI NIH HHS CA97959NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097959NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are believed to be resistant to currently available therapies and may be responsible for relapse of cancer in patients. Measuring circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood of patients has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic procedure for screening patients who may be at high risk for developing metastatic cancers or relapse of the cancer disease. However, accurate detection of CTCs has remained a problem, as epithelial-cell markers used to date are not always reliable for detecting CTCs, especially during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. As CSCs are required to initiate metastatic tumors, our goal was to optimize and standardize a method for identifying circulating CSCs (CCSCs) in patients, using established CSC markers. Here, we report for the first time the detection of CCSCs in the blood of athymic nude mice, bearing metastatic tumors, and in the blood of patients positive for colonic adenocarcinomas. Using a simple and non-expensive method, we isolated a relatively pure population of CSCs (CD45-/CK19+), free of red blood cells and largely free of contaminating CD45+ white blood cells. Enriched CCSCs from patients with colon adenocarcinomas had a malignant phenotype and co-expressed CSC markers (DCLK1/LGR5) with CD44/Annexin A2. CSCs were not found in the blood of non-cancer patients, free of colonic growths. Enriched CCSCs from colon cancer patients grew primary spheroids, suggesting the presence of tumor-initiating cells in the blood of these patients. In conclusion, we have developed a novel diagnostic assay for detecting CSCs in circulation, which may more accurately predict the risk of relapse or metastatic disease in patients. As CSCs can potentially initiate metastatic growths, patients positive for CCSCs can be treated with inhibitory agents that selectively target CSCs, besides conventional treatments, to reduce the risk of relapse/metastatic disease for improving clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAnimalsColonic NeoplasmsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Stem CellsRecurrenceGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25347154
PMCPMC4281282
OpenAlexW1968933400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.