Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2015
Early relapse after single auto-SCT for multiple myeloma is a major predictor of survival in the era of novel agents.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenging the concept of functional high-risk myeloma through transcriptional and genetic profiling.Blood · 2025Trial
- Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with earlyHaematologica · 2024Trial
- Functional high-risk phenotype predicts poor survival in multiple myeloma independent of front-line treatment: A secondary analysis of CIBMTR data.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- The Strange Case of Functional High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients: Is It Possible to Identify Them in Clinical Practice?Cancers · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Isatuximab, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone (IsaKd) in Multiple Myeloma Patients at the First Relapse After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance: Results from the Multicenter, Real-Life AENEID Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High-risk features of early relapse in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma: The impact of cytogenetics and response to initial therapy.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Poor outcome despite modern treatments: A retrospective study of 99 patients with primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Targeted immunotherapy: harnessing the immune system to battle multiple myeloma.Cell death discovery · 2024Review
- A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Review
- Prognostic nomogram for multiple myeloma early relapse after autologous stem cell transplant in the novel agent era.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Definers and drivers of functional high-risk multiple myeloma: insights from genomic, transcriptomic, and immune profiling.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Risk Stratification Before and During Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: From Clinical Trials to the Real-World Setting.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Utopia or Continuous Challenge in Aiming for Cure?Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- Novel prognostic scoring system for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2020Article
- c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma.European journal of haematology · 2020Article
- Expert Panel Consensus Statement for Proper Evaluation of First Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019Review
- Revised International Staging System Is Predictive and Prognostic for Early Relapse (<24 months) after Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019Article
- Article
- Increased circulating CD4Oncotarget · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of auto-SCT in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the era of novel agents continues to evolve. It is now clear that the depth of response and clinical outcomes have significantly improved as a result of the combination of these strategies. However, not all patients with MM who undergo auto-SCT are able to sustain a meaningful response and 20% of patients relapse shortly after auto-SCT. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of early relapse (ER) after auto-SCT on OS for MM patients undergoing single auto-SCT who had received novel agent-based induction regimens. All consecutive patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT from January 2002 to September 2012 who had novel induction therapy were evaluated. A total of 184 patients were identified. The median OS and PFS for the group of transplanted patients were 93 and 25.4 months, respectively. Median time to relapse was 17.2 months with 40% having relapsed at the time of analysis. ER (<12 months post auto-SCT) was seen in 27 (36%) out of 75 patients who had relapsed, and median OS was significantly shorter than in those with non-ER. Multivariate analysis showed ER as the major independent prognostic factor for OS. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that not only attainment of a good response, but sustainability of it, appears to be a major prognostic variable in MM in the era of novel therapy. Patients with ER post auto-SCT should biologically be characterized in prospective studies to better understand the mechanisms of resistance associated with this particular entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.