Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25346881›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2014

Models of Impulsivity with a Focus on Waiting Impulsivity: Translational Potential for Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Valerie Voon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Waiting Impulsivity: The Influence of Acute Methylphenidate and Feedback.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Trial
  2. Premature release of action sequences in adolescent male rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Selective Inhibitory Control in Middle Childhood.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impulsivities and addictions: a multidimensional integrative framework informing assessment and interventions for substance use disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Adenosine ATranslational psychiatry · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Valerie VoonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK ; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waiting impulsivity, also known as premature or anticipatory responding, is well established in preclinical studies through the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time (5-CSRT) task. Waiting impulsivity is important in disorders of addiction. Preclinical studies suggest a role both as a predictor, and as a consequence, in disorders of addiction. Here we discuss the relationship between the preclinical 5-CSRT and translational fidelity in newly developed translational tasks. Preclinical and clinical literature relevant to premature responding and disorders of addiction are reviewed. Understanding which processes are critical to premature responding is important in understanding the nature of premature responding. Premature responding may also have overlaps with motivational processes, proactive response inhibition, tonic inhibitory processes, and delay discounting.

Indexed as

5-CSRTAddictionImpulsivityPremature respondingWaiting impulsivity

Identifiers

PMID25346881
PMCPMC4201744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.