Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25346685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2014

Primary empathy deficits in frontotemporal dementia.

Sandra Baez, Facundo Manes, David Huepe, Teresa Torralva, Natalia Fiorentino, Fabian Richter, Daniela Huepe-Artigas, Jesica Ferrari, Patricia Montañes, Pablo Reyes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
138.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Can prosocial values improve brain health?Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Sandra BaezInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina ; UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile ; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Facundo ManesInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina ; UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile ; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David HuepeUDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile ; Laboratory of Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, Universidad Diego Portales Santiago, Chile.
Teresa TorralvaInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina ; UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile.
Natalia FiorentinoInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina ; UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile.
Fabian RichterDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
Daniela Huepe-ArtigasUDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile ; Laboratory of Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, Universidad Diego Portales Santiago, Chile.
Jesica FerrariInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia MontañesDepartamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Instituto de Envejecimiento, Universidad Javeriana, Hospital San Ignacio Bogotá, Colombia ; Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, Colombia.
Pablo ReyesDepartamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Instituto de Envejecimiento, Universidad Javeriana, Hospital San Ignacio Bogotá, Colombia.
Diana MatallanaDepartamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Instituto de Envejecimiento, Universidad Javeriana, Hospital San Ignacio Bogotá, Colombia.
Nora S ViglieccaNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Instituto de Humanidades (IDH) de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba, Argentina.
Jean DecetyDepartment of Psychology and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
Agustin IbanezInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) & Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University Buenos Aires, Argentina ; UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience (UIFCoN), Diego Portales University Santiago, Chile ; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Australian Research Council (ACR) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Universidad Autonoma del Caribe Barranquilla, Colombia.
Diego Portales University · CLAustralian Research Council · AUCentro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan · ARFavaloro University · ARInstituto de Neurología Cognitiva · ARUniversidad Autónoma del Caribe · COUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of empathy is an early central symptom and diagnostic criterion of the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Although changes in empathy are evident and strongly affect the social functioning of bvFTD patients, few studies have directly investigated this issue by means of experimental paradigms. The current study assessed multiple components of empathy (affective, cognitive and moral) in bvFTD patients. We also explored whether the loss of empathy constitutes a primary deficit of bvFTD or whether it is explained by impairments in executive functions (EF) or other social cognition domains. Thirty-seven bvFTD patients with early/mild stages of the disease and 30 healthy control participants were assessed with a task that involves the perception of intentional and accidental harm. Participants were also evaluated on emotion recognition, theory of mind (ToM), social norms knowledge and several EF domains. BvFTD patients presented deficits in affective, cognitive and moral aspects of empathy. However, empathic concern was the only aspect primarily affected in bvFTD that was neither related nor explained by deficits in EF or other social cognition domains. Deficits in the cognitive and moral aspects of empathy seem to depend on EF, emotion recognition and ToM. Our findings highlight the importance of using tasks depicting real-life social scenarios because of their greater sensitivity in the assessment of bvFTD. Moreover, our results contribute to the understanding of primary and intrinsic empathy deficits of bvFTD and have important theoretical and clinical implications.

Indexed as

behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementiaempathic concernempathyexecutive functionsmoral judgmentsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID25346685
PMCPMC4193328
OpenAlexW2081146438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.