Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25346664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Electrophysiological monitoring of injury progression in the rat cerebellar cortex.

Gokhan Ordek, Archana Proddutur, Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar, Bryan J Pfister, Mesut Sahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gokhan OrdekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ, USA.
Archana ProdduturDepartment of Neurology and Neurosciences, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences Newark, NJ, USA.
Vijayalakshmi SanthakumarDepartment of Neurology and Neurosciences, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences Newark, NJ, USA.
Bryan J PfisterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ, USA.
Mesut SahinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ, USA.
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USRutgers Health

Funding

Perisomatic Inhibitory Network Dysfunction in Neurological DiseaseR01NS069861 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SANTHAKUMAR, VIJAYALAKSHMI · 2011 to 2022
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The changes of excitability in affected neural networks can be used as a marker to study the temporal course of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The cerebellum is an ideal platform to study brain injury mechanisms at the network level using the electrophysiological methods. Within its crystalline morphology, the cerebellar cortex contains highly organized topographical subunits that are defined by two main inputs, the climbing (CFs) and mossy fibers (MFs). Here we demonstrate the use of cerebellar evoked potentials (EPs) mediated through these afferent systems for monitoring the injury progression in a rat model of fluid percussion injury (FPI). A mechanical tap on the dorsal hand was used as a stimulus, and EPs were recorded from the paramedian lobule (PML) of the posterior cerebellum via multi-electrode arrays (MEAs). Post-injury evoked response amplitudes (EPAs) were analyzed on a daily basis for 1 week and compared with pre-injury values. We found a trend of consistently decreasing EPAs in all nine animals, losing as much as 72 ± 4% of baseline amplitudes measured before the injury. Notably, our results highlighted two particular time windows; the first 24 h of injury in the acute period and day-3 to day-7 in the delayed period where the largest drops (~50% and 24%) were observed in the EPAs. In addition, cross-correlations of spontaneous signals between electrode pairs declined (from 0.47 ± 0.1 to 0.35 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) along with the EPAs throughout the week of injury. In support of the electrophysiological findings, immunohistochemical analysis at day-7 post-injury showed detectable Purkinje cell loss at low FPI pressures and more with the largest pressures used. Our results suggest that sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded from the cerebellar surface can be a useful technique to monitor the course of cerebellar injury and identify the phases of injury progression even at mild levels.

Indexed as

cerebellar evoked potentialsmicro-ECoGmulti-electrode arraysPurkinje cellstraumatic injury model

Identifiers

PMID25346664
PMCPMC4191519
OpenAlexW1980182557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.