Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25345779›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2015

Outcomes of serial dilation for high-grade radiation-related esophageal strictures in head and neck cancer patients.

David O Francis, Eric Hall, Jennifer H Dang, Gregory R Vlacich, James L Netterville, Michael F Vaezi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improved symptomatic, functional, and fluoroscopic outcomes following serial "series of three" double-balloon dilation for cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David O FrancisDepartment of Otolaryngology, Nashville, Tennessee; Bill Wilkerson Center, Center for Surgical Quality & Outcomes Research, Nashville, Tennessee.
Eric Hall
Jennifer H Dang
Gregory R Vlacich
James L Netterville
Michael F Vaezi
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBaylor University Medical Center · USQuality Research · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Developing an Outcome Measuring Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis DisabilityK23DC013559 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FRANCIS, DAVID O. · 2014 to 2018
$990k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIDCD NIH HHS 1K23DC013559NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC013559NIDCD NIH HHS L30 DC012687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisDysphagia and esophageal stricture are frequent consequences of treatment for head and neck cancer. This study examines the effectiveness of the anterograde-retrograde rendezvous procedure and serial dilations in reestablishing esophageal patency to allow return to oral diet and gastrostomy tube removal in a cohort of patients with complete or near-complete esophageal stricture following nonsurgical cancer treatment. STUDY

designRetrospective review of patients treated with radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy presented with complete or near-complete esophageal stricture. Patients underwent serial dilations using combined anterograde-retrograde dilation (rendezvous) techniques.

methodsMedical records of patients having undergone treatment between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed, and semistructured interviews were also conducted to determine current swallowing function and actual patient experience. The primary outcome was swallowing improvement that allowed for return to oral diet and/or gastrostomy tube removal. Outcomes were compared between patients with complete and near-complete (<5 mm in diameter) strictures and univariate analysis performed to identify associations between patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics on odds of gastrostomy tube removal.

resultsTwenty-four patients (median age 59.5 years, 63% male, 91% Caucasian) underwent treatment. Fifty percent of patients had complete occlusion of the esophageal lumen. The majority of patients (92%) underwent either anterograde (54%) or combined antero-retrograde (38%) approach. Following a median (interquartile range) of 9 (6-20) dilation sessions, 42% of patients were able to return to an oral diet and/or had their gastrostomy tube removed. This outcome was independent of whether the stricture was complete or near complete (P = .67). Of patients who had their gastrostomy tubes removed, only 33.3% had ever smoked, compared to 92.3% of those whose tubes were not discharged (P = .007).

conclusionsRecannulation is possible even in cases of complete or near-complete stricture. Several factors appear to impact the likelihood of successful outcome, but in this study, only patients with a history of smoking had a significantly lower likelihood of return to full oral diet.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesDilatationEsophageal StenosisEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageCombined anterograde and retrograde dilationdysphagiaesophageal stricturegastrostomy tube dependencehead and neck cancerradiation complicationsrendezvous procedure

Identifiers

PMID25345779
PMCPMC4376622
OpenAlexW1486158498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.