Trial reportThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015
Randomized comparison of acute stent malapposition between platinum-chromium versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents.
Trial report in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized Comparison of Strut Coverage between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Myocardial Infarction at 3-Month Optical Coherence Tomography.Yonsei medical journal · 2018Trial
- Impact of diabetes mellitus on the early-phase arterial healing after drug-eluting stent implantation.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Observational
- Severe Acute Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Effects on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Predictors and Long-Term Clinical Impact of Acute Stent Malapposition: An Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) Intravascular Ultrasound Substudy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No randomized data exist regarding optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation immediately post-procedure and at the 3-month follow-up for platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PtCr-EES) versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). A total of 100 patients were randomly assigned to undergo PtCr-EES (n = 51) or CoCr-EES (n = 49) implantation. OCT was serially evaluated after stent deployment with nominal pressure and immediately post-procedure, and 3-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was the percentage of malapposed strut after nominal pressure and immediately post-procedure. Compared to the CoCr-EES, the PtCr-EES showed a lower tendency of percent malapposed strut at nominal pressure [median value (interquartile range); 4.1 % (0.5-11.7) vs. 7.6 % (2.9-13.7), p = 0.082] and immediately post-procedure [1.2 % (0-3.4) vs. 2.5 % (0.7-5.3), p = 0.051]. The percentage of cross sections with any malapposed struts was significantly lower with PtCr-EES at nominal pressure [15.0 % (5.6-39.0) vs. 23.8 % (18.2-44.4), p = 0.036] and immediately post-procedure [6.5 % (0-15.3) vs. 10.5 % (7.1-20.0), p = 0.026]. At the 3-month follow-up, both PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES showed comparable percentages of malapposed struts (0 vs. 0 %, respectively, p = 0.332) and uncovered struts (5.3 vs. 4.7 %, respectively, p = 0.829). We found a significant correlation between the immediate post-procedural percentage of malapposed struts versus the percentage of uncovered struts (r = 0.430, p < 0.001) at the 3-month follow-up. Compared to the CoCr-EES, the PtCr-EES shows a lower tendency toward a lower percentage of malapposed struts but no significant difference in strut coverage at the 3-month follow-up. The percentage of malapposed struts immediately post-procedure was correlated with strut coverage at the 3-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.