Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25345603›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2015

Transcriptomic profiling facilitates classification of response to influenza challenge.

Emma E Davenport, Richard D Antrobus, Patrick J Lillie, Sarah Gilbert, Julian C Knight

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05336851 (Emergency PanorOmic Wide Association Study in Respiratory Infectious Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05336851 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Emergency PanorOmic Wide Association Study in Respiratory Infectious Disease (ePWAS-RID)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2023 to 2028Enrolled2,000ConditionsViral Infections, Bacterial Infections, Fungal Infections, Mixed InfectionArmsBiomarker blood draw and saliva collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. RTP4 inhibits IFN-I response and enhances experimental cerebral malaria and neuropathology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma E DavenportWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
Richard D Antrobus
Patrick J Lillie
Sarah Gilbert
Julian C Knight

Funding

European Research Council 281824Medical Research Council 91070Medical Research Council G0900747Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 074318Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDespite increases in vaccination coverage, reductions in influenza-related mortality have not been observed. Better vaccines are therefore required and influenza challenge studies can be used to test the efficacy of new vaccines. However, this requires the accurate post-challenge classification of subjects by outcome, which is limited in current methods that use artificial thresholds to assign 'symptomatic' and 'asymptomatic' phenotypes. We present data from an influenza challenge study in which 22 healthy adults (11 vaccinated) were inoculated with H3N2 influenza (A/Wisconsin/67/2005). We generated genome-wide gene expression data from peripheral blood taken immediately before the challenge and at 12, 24 and 48 h post-challenge. Variation in symptomatic scoring was found amongst those with laboratory confirmed influenza. By combining the dynamic transcriptomic data with the clinical parameters this variability can be reduced. We identified four subjects with severe laboratory confirmed influenza that show differential gene expression in 1103 probes 48 h post-challenge compared to the remaining subjects. We have further reduced this profile to six genes (CCL2, SEPT4, LAMP3, RTP4, MT1G and OAS3) that can be used to define these subjects. We have used this gene set to predict symptomatic infection from an independent study. This analysis gives further insight into host-pathogen interactions during influenza infection. However, the major potential value is in the clinical trial setting by providing a more quantitative method to better classify symptomatic individuals post influenza challenge. KEY MESSAGE: Differential gene expression signatures are seen following influenza challenge. Expression of six predictive genes can classify response to influenza challenge. The genomic influenza response classification replicates in an independent dataset.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeAdolescentAdultFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25345603
PMCPMC4281383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.