Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344903›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2014

Bioinformatics for cancer immunotherapy target discovery.

Lars Rønn Olsen, Benito Campos, Mike Stein Barnkob, Ole Winther, Vladimir Brusic, Mads Hald Andersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MuPeXI: prediction of neo-epitopes from tumor sequencing data.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2017
    Article
  13. TANTIGEN: a comprehensive database of tumor T cell antigens.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2017
    Article
  14. Peptide vaccines in cancer-old concept revisited.Current opinion in immunology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lars Rønn OlsenDepartment of Biology, Bioinformatics Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark, lro@binf.ku.dk.
Benito Campos
Mike Stein Barnkob
Ole Winther
Vladimir Brusic
Mads Hald Andersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms of immune response to cancer have been studied extensively and great effort has been invested into harnessing the therapeutic potential of the immune system. Immunotherapies have seen significant advances in the past 20 years, but the full potential of protective and therapeutic cancer immunotherapies has yet to be fulfilled. The insufficient efficacy of existing treatments can be attributed to a number of biological and technical issues. In this review, we detail the current limitations of immunotherapy target selection and design, and review computational methods to streamline therapy target discovery in a bioinformatics analysis pipeline. We describe specialized bioinformatics tools and databases for three main bottlenecks in immunotherapy target discovery: the cataloging of potentially antigenic proteins, the identification of potential HLA binders, and the selection epitopes and co-targets for single-epitope and multi-epitope strategies. We provide examples of application to the well-known tumor antigen HER2 and suggest bioinformatics methods to ameliorate therapy resistance and ensure efficient and lasting control of tumors.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25344903
PMCPMC11029190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.