ReviewTransgenic research2015
A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments.
Review in Transgenic research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- T-DNA Analyzer: A Long-Read Sequencing Pipeline for Characterizing T-DNA Insertion Sites in Transgenic Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Gene Flow and Hybridization Potential Between GM/NGT Crops and Conventional Varieties or Wild Relatives: A Scoping Literature Review with Emphasis on Oilseed Rape (Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Evolution of the Canadian regulatory system for plant biotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Potential of NGTs to Overcome Constraints in Plant Breeding and Their Regulatory Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Deciphering the complex molecular architecture of the genetically modified soybean FG72 through paired-end whole genome sequencing.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A visible seedling-stage screening system for the Brassica napus hybrid breeding by a novel hypocotyl length-regulated gene BnHL.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- One risk assessment for genetically modified plants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Experiences, learnings and perspectives in the regulation of agricultural biotechnology: the view from Argentina.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- IPD3, a master regulator of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, affects genes for immunity and metabolism of non-host Arabidopsis when restored long after its evolutionary loss.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- T-DNA characterization of genetically modified 3-R-gene late blight-resistant potato events with a novel procedure utilizing the Samplix XdropFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Compositional and Morphological Analysis of Salt Stress Tolerant Mannitol-1-phosphate Dehydrogenase (mtlD)-Transgenic Potato Plants.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Green revolution to genome revolution: driving better resilient crops against environmental instability.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Comparison of the Phenotypic Performance, Molecular Diversity, and Proteomics in Transgenic Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- MqsR toxin as a biotechnological tool for plant pathogen bacterial control.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dietary Behavior ofJournal of xenobiotics · 2021Article
- Influence of transgenesis on genome variability in cucumber lines with aPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Article
- Molecular characterization for food safety assessment of a genetically modified late blight resistant potato: an unusual case.Transgenic research · 2021Article
- Transparency in risk-disproportionate regulation of modern crop-breeding techniques.GM crops & food · 2021Article
- Hypothesis-based food, feed, and environmental safety assessment of GM crops: A case study using maize event DP-202216-6.GM crops & food · 2021Review
- Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Plant : journal of the Tissue Culture Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During genetic engineering, DNA is inserted into a plant's genome, and such insertions are often accompanied by the insertion of additional DNA, deletions and/or rearrangements. These genetic changes are collectively known as insertional effects, and they have the potential to give rise to unintended traits in plants. In addition, there are many other genetic changes that occur in plants both spontaneously and as a result of conventional breeding practices. Genetic changes similar to insertional effects occur in plants, namely as a result of the movement of transposable elements, the repair of double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining, and the intracellular transfer of organelle DNA. Based on this similarity, insertional effects should present a similar level of risk as these other genetic changes in plants, and it is within the context of these genetic changes that insertional effects must be considered. Increased familiarity with genetic engineering techniques and advances in molecular analysis techniques have provided us with a greater understanding of the nature and impact of genetic changes in plants, and this can be used to refine pre-market assessments of genetically engineered plants and food and feeds derived from genetically engineered plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.