Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344686›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2014

Taming the wild: resolving the gene pools of non-model Arabidopsis lineages.

Nora Hohmann, Roswitha Schmickl, Tzen-Yuh Chiang, Magdalena Lučanová, Filip Kolář, Karol Marhold, Marcus A Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cucumber Mosaic Virus Infection inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Unraveling the Chloroplast Genomes of TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. AoB PLANTS · 2019
    Review
  14. PhytoKeys · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nora HohmannCentre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. nora.hohmann@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
Roswitha SchmicklCentre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. roswitha.schmickl@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
Tzen-Yuh ChiangDepartment of Life Sciences, Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. tychiang@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Magdalena LučanováInstitute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. kubesovm@gmail.com.
Filip KolářInstitute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. filip.kolar@gmail.com.
Karol MarholdInstitute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. karol.marhold@savba.sk.
Marcus A KochCentre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. marcus.koch@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWild relatives in the genus Arabidopsis are recognized as useful model systems to study traits and evolutionary processes in outcrossing species, which are often difficult or even impossible to investigate in the selfing and annual Arabidopsis thaliana. However, Arabidopsis as a genus is littered with sub-species and ecotypes which make realizing the potential of these non-model Arabidopsis lineages problematic. There are relatively few evolutionary studies which comprehensively characterize the gene pools across all of the Arabidopsis supra-groups and hypothesized evolutionary lineages and none include sampling at a world-wide scale. Here we explore the gene pools of these various taxa using various molecular markers and cytological analyses.

resultsBased on ITS, microsatellite, chloroplast and nuclear DNA content data we demonstrate the presence of three major evolutionary groups broadly characterized as A. lyrata group, A. halleri group and A. arenosa group. All are composed of further species and sub-species forming larger aggregates. Depending on the resolution of the marker, a few closely related taxa such as A. pedemontana, A. cebennensis and A. croatica are also clearly distinct evolutionary lineages. ITS sequences and a population-based screen based on microsatellites were highly concordant. The major gene pools identified by ITS sequences were also significantly differentiated by their homoploid nuclear DNA content estimated by flow cytometry. The chloroplast genome provided less resolution than the nuclear data, and it remains unclear whether the extensive haplotype sharing apparent between taxa results from gene flow or incomplete lineage sorting in this relatively young group of species with Pleistocene origins.

conclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive overview of the genetic variation within and among the various taxa of the genus Arabidopsis. The resolved gene pools and evolutionary lineages will set the framework for future comparative studies on genetic diversity. Extensive population-based phylogeographic studies will also be required, however, in particular for A. arenosa and their affiliated taxa and cytotypes.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBiological EvolutionChloroplastsEcotypeGene FlowGene PoolGenetic VariationGenome, ChloroplastMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogeography

Identifiers

PMID25344686
PMCPMC4216345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.