Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344684›Full record

ArticleTrials2014

Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials.

Jo Rick, Jonathan Graffy, Peter Knapp, Nicola Small, David J Collier, Sandra Eldridge, Anne Kennedy, Chris Salisbury, Shaun Treweek, David Torgerson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04683510 (Increasing Recruitment of Underrepresented Cancer Survivors With Awareness Enhancing Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04683510 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Increasing Recruitment of Underrepresented Cancer Survivors With Awareness Enhancing Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2021 to 2025Enrolled4,451ConditionsResearch AwarenessArmsNavigation - Study Specific - Researcher Voice, Navigation - Study Specific - Cancer Survivor Voice, Navigation - Research General - Researcher Voice, Navigation - Research General - Cancer Survivor Voice, Brochure - Study Specific - Researcher Voice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jo Rick
Jonathan Graffy
Peter Knapp
Nicola Small
David J Collier
Sandra Eldridge
Anne Kennedy
Chris Salisbury
Shaun Treweek
David Torgerson
Paul Wallace
Vichithranie Madurasinghe
Adwoa Hughes-Morley
Peter BowerMedical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. peter.bower@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2012-05-128Medical Research Council G0701575Medical Research Council G1002325Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials play a central role in evidence-based practice, but recruitment of participants, and retention of them once in the trial, is challenging. Moreover, there is a dearth of evidence that research teams can use to inform the development of their recruitment and retention strategies. As with other healthcare initiatives, the fairest test of the effectiveness of a recruitment strategy is a trial comparing alternatives, which for recruitment would mean embedding a recruitment trial within an ongoing host trial. Systematic reviews indicate that such studies are rare. Embedded trials are largely delivered in an ad hoc way, with interventions almost always developed in isolation and tested in the context of a single host trial, limiting their ability to contribute to a body of evidence with regard to a single recruitment intervention and to researchers working in different contexts. METHODS/

designThe Systematic Techniques for Assisting Recruitment to Trials (START) program is funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) Methodology Research Programme to support the routine adoption of embedded trials to test standardized recruitment interventions across ongoing host trials. To achieve this aim, the program involves three interrelated work packages: (1) methodology - to develop guidelines for the design, analysis and reporting of embedded recruitment studies; (2) interventions - to develop effective and useful recruitment interventions; and (3) implementation - to recruit host trials and test interventions through embedded studies. DISCUSSION: Successful completion of the START program will provide a model for a platform for the wider trials community to use to evaluate recruitment interventions or, potentially, other types of intervention linked to trial conduct. It will also increase the evidence base for two types of recruitment intervention.

trial registrationThe START protocol covers the methodology for embedded trials. Each embedded trial is registered separately or as a substudy of the host trial.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionSample SizeAccess to InformationCommunicationDecision Support TechniquesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMultimediaPatient Education as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicProgram DevelopmentRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch PersonnelResearch SubjectsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25344684
PMCPMC4230578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.