ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2014
Patients' continuing use of an online health record: a quantitative evaluation of 14,000 patient years of access data.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Participation in eHealth Communication Interventions Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Internet Access and Use by Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Disparities in electronic health record portal access and use among patients with cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- The Role of Access Type and Age Group in the Breadth of Use of Patient Portals: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Observational
- Identifying major impact factors affecting the continuance intention of mHealth: a systematic review and multi-subgroup meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Article
- Persistent digital divide in health-related internet use among cancer survivors: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2018.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Features of a Patient Portal for Blood Test Results and Patient Health Engagement: Web-Based Pre-Post Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Metrics for Outpatient Portal Use Based on Log File Analysis: Algorithm Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Acceptability and Feasibility of a Disease-specific Patient Portal in Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · 2019Article
- Patient Engagement as Measured by Inpatient Portal Use: Methodology for Log File Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Empowering Patients during Hospitalization: Perspectives on Inpatient Portal Use.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Inpatient portal clusters: identifying user groups based on portal features.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- European ADPKD Forum multidisciplinary position statement on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease care: European ADPKD Forum and Multispecialist Roundtable participants.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2018Article
- Presentation of laboratory test results in patient portals: influence of interface design on risk interpretation and visual search behaviour.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline access to all or part of their health records is widely demanded by patients and, where provided in form of patient portals, has been substantially used by at least subgroups of patients, particularly those with chronic disease. However, little is reported regarding the longer-term patient use of patient-accessible electronic health record services, which is important in allocating resources. Renal PatientView (RPV) is an established system that gives patients with chronic kidney disease access to live test results and information about their condition and treatment. It is available in most UK renal units with up to 75% of particular patient groups registered in some centers. We have analyzed patient use out to 4 years and investigated factors associated with more persistent use.
objectiveOur aim was to investigate RPV use by patients over time from initial registration in order to understand which patients choose to access RPV and the endurance of its appeal for different patient groups.
methodsWe analyzed an anonymized extract of the database underlying RPV containing information on patient registration and events including patient access and the arrival of new blood test results or letters that patients might wish to view.
resultsAt the time of the extract, there were 11,352 patients registered on RPV for 0-42 months (median 17). More than half of registrants became persistent users, logging in a median of 2.0 times each month over post-registration intervals of up to 42 months (median 18.9). Provision of assistance with first logon was strongly associated with becoming a persistent user, even at 3 years. Logons by persistent users occurred around the time of consultations/tests, strongly suggestive of patient engagement. While indices indicative of greater deprivation were the strongest determinants of non-participation, they had negligible influence on drop-out rates among established users.
conclusionsIn this mature patient portal system, a large proportion of patients made regular use of their online health records over protracted periods. The patterns and timing of use indicate strong patient interest in detailed information such as recent test results and clinic letters. Supporting patients through the first steps of establishing access to their online records is associated with much higher rates of long-term use of RPV and likely would increase use of other electronic health records provided for patients with chronic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.