Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344488›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Protocol for developing the evidence base for a national salt reduction programme for India.

Claire Johnson, Sailesh Mohan, Deversetty Praveen, Mark Woodward, Pallab K Maulik, Roopa Shivashankar, Ritvik Amarchand, Jacqui Webster, Elizabeth Dunford, Sudhir Raj Thout and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Salt intake and salt-reduction strategies in South Asia: From evidence to action.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire JohnsonGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Sailesh MohanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Deversetty PraveenGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Mark WoodwardGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Pallab K MaulikGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Roopa ShivashankarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Ritvik AmarchandAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Jacqui WebsterGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth DunfordGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Sudhir Raj ThoutGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Graham MacGregorWolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, London, UK.
Feng HeWolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, London, UK.
K Srinath ReddyPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Anand KrishnanAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Bruce NealGeorge Institute for Global Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
George Institute for Global Health · GBAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCentre for Chronic Disease Control · INPublic Health Foundation of India · INUniversity of Oxford · GBWolfson Foundation · GB

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/13/1/500879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe scientific evidence base in support of salt reduction is strong but the data required to translate these insights into reduced population salt intake are mostly absent. The aim of this research project is to develop the evidence base required to formulate and implement a national salt reduction programme for India. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research will comprise three components: a stakeholder analysis involving government, industry, consumers and civil society organisations; a population survey using an age-stratified and sex-stratified random samples drawn from urban (slum and non-slum) and rural areas of North and South India; and a systematic quantitative evaluation of the nutritional components of processed and restaurant foods. The stakeholder interviews will be analysed using qualitative methods to summarise the main themes and define the broad range of factors influencing the food environment in India. The population survey will estimate the mean daily salt consumption through the collection of 24 h urine samples with concurrent dietary surveys identifying the main sources of dietary sodium/salt. The survey of foods will record the nutritional composition of the chief elements of food supply. The findings from this research will be synthesised and proposals for a national salt reduction strategy for India will be developed in collaboration with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of Sydney and the Centre for Chronic Disease Control in New Delhi, and also by the Indian Health Ministry's Screening Committee. The project began fieldwork in February 2014 and will report the main results in 2016. The findings will be targeted primarily at public health policymakers and advocates, but will be disseminated widely through other mechanisms including conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications, as well as to the participating communities.

Indexed as

Diet, Sodium-RestrictedEvidence-Based PracticeNutrition PolicyHumansHypertensionIndiaPublic HealthSodium Chloride, DietarySodium Chloride, DietaryEPIDEMIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25344488
PMCPMC4212187
OpenAlexW2039331516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.