Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344393›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

A novel cognitive behaviour therapy for bipolar disorders (Think Effectively About Mood Swings or TEAMS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Warren Mansell, Sara Tai, Alexandra Clark, Savas Akgonul, Graham Dunn, Linda Davies, Heather Law, Richard Morriss, Neil Tinning, Anthony P Morrison

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04859647 (Client-led Online Therapy for People Diagnosed With Bipolar Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04859647 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Client-led Online Therapy for People Diagnosed With Bipolar Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManchesterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsBipolar Spectrum DisorderArmsMethod of Levels Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Warren Mansell
Sara Tai
Alexandra Clark
Savas Akgonul
Graham Dunn
Linda Davies
Heather Law
Richard MorrissThe Psychosis Research Unit, GMW Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Harrop House, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL, UK. richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk.
Neil Tinning
Anthony P Morrison
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting psychological therapies for bipolar disorders have been found to have mixed results, with a consensus that they provide a significant, but modest, effect on clinical outcomes. Typically, these approaches have focused on promoting strategies to prevent future relapse. An alternative treatment approach, termed 'Think Effectively About Mood Swings' (TEAMS) addresses current symptoms, including subclinical hypomania, depression and anxiety, and promotes long-term recovery. Following the publication of a theoretical model, a range of research studies testing the model and a case series have demonstrated positive results. The current study reports the protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial to inform a future multi-centre trial. METHODS/

designA target number of 84 patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder, or bipolar disorder not-otherwise-specified are screened, allocated to a baseline assessment and randomized to either 16 sessions of TEAMS therapy plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU. Patients complete self-report inventories of depression, anxiety, recovery status and bipolar cognitions targeted by TEAMS. Assessments of diagnosis, bipolar symptoms, medication, access to services and quality of life are conducted by assessors blind to treatment condition at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization. The main aim is to evaluate recruitment and retention of participants into both arms of the study, as well as adherence to therapy, to determine feasibility and acceptability. It is predicted that TEAMS plus TAU will reduce self-reported depression in comparison to TAU alone at six months post-randomization. The secondary hypotheses are that TEAMS will reduce the severity of hypomanic symptoms and anxiety, reduce bipolar cognitions, improve social functioning and promote recovery compared to TAU alone at post-treatment and follow-up. The study also incorporates semi-structured interviews about the experiences of previous treatment and the experience of TEAMS therapy that will be subject to qualitative analyses to inform future developments of the approach. DISCUSSION: The design will provide preliminary evidence of efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, uptake, attrition and barriers to treatment to design a definitive trial of this novel intervention compared to treatment as usual.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN83928726) on registered 25 July 2014.

Indexed as

AffectResearch DesignThinkingBipolar DisorderClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHealth Care CostsHumansInterviews as TopicPilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25344393
PMCPMC4219108
OpenAlexW2121986432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.