Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25344128›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

Patient perspectives on having multiple versus single prescribers of chronic disease medications: results of a qualitative study in a veteran population.

Corrine I Voils, Betsy Sleath, Matthew L Maciejewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The experience of financial burden for people with multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corrine I VoilsDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, 508 Fulton St. (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA. corrine.voils@mc.duke.edu.
Betsy SleathDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. betsy_sleath@unc.edu.
Matthew L MaciejewskiDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, 508 Fulton St. (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA. matthew.maciejewski@va.gov.

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
The Continuity of Medication Management (COMM) StudyR21HS019445 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MACIEJEWSKI, MATTHEW L · 2010 to 2010
$455k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS019445AHRQ HHS R21HS019445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with multiple chronic conditions often have multiple prescribers, which has been associated with greater health care utilization and medication nonadherence in claims-based analyses. This qualitative study was conducted to understand the reasons why patients have increasing numbers of prescribers of medications and to understand patient perspectives on advantages and disadvantages of having multiple prescribers, including effects on medication supply.

methodsThis qualitative study involved three focus groups comprising 23 outpatients from a single Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center with at least one chronic cardiometabolic condition (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, or congestive heart failure). Participants were asked about their experiences, including perceived of advantages and disadvantages, of having multiple prescribers of cardiometabolic medications. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze the data.

resultsMultiple prescribers arose through referrals and patients actively seeking non-VA prescribers (primary care and/or specialist) to maximize timeliness and access to medications, provide access to medications not on the VA formulary, and minimize out-of-pocket costs. Patients seeking non-VA care had to coordinate own their care by sharing prescriptions and test results to their prescribers within and outside VA.

conclusionsPrescribing physicians should engage in open dialogue with patients to create a shared understanding of patient and provider goals and priorities for chronic disease medications.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAdultAgedAttitude to HealthChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusDyslipidemiasFemaleHeart FailureHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID25344128
PMCPMC4233094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.