Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25343602›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2014

A Star of David catenane.

David A Leigh, Robin G Pritchard, Alexander J Stephens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design and Structural Transformations of Zinc(II) Knotted Cage Frameworks.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  3. Strain-Controlled Synthesis of [Organic letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Phosphorescent metallaknots of Au(I)-bis(acetylide) strands directed by Cu(I) π-coordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A CuJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Story of the Little Blue Box: A Tribute to Siegfried Hünig.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Molecular weaving.Nature materials · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A ravel alliance.Nature chemistry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David A LeighSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Robin G PritchardSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Alexander J StephensSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the synthesis of a [2]catenane that consists of two triply entwined 114-membered rings, a molecular link. The woven scaffold is a hexameric circular helicate generated by the assembly of six tris(bipyridine) ligands with six iron(II) cations, with the size of the helicate promoted by the use of sulfate counterions. The structure of the ligand extension directs subsequent covalent capture of the catenane by ring-closing olefin metathesis. Confirmation of the Star of David topology (two rings, six crossings) is provided by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and X-ray crystallography. Extraction of the iron(II) ions with tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate affords the wholly organic molecular link. The self-assembly of interwoven circular frameworks of controlled size, and their subsequent closure by multiple directed covalent bond-forming reactions, provides a powerful strategy for the synthesis of molecular topologies of ever-increasing complexity.

Identifiers

PMID25343602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.